The 'New World Order'

 
Home Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 God's Plan
The New World Order

Prepping 101: Ultimate Guide to Survival and Emergency Preparedness

Essential Tips and Tools for Prepping, Urban Survival, Wilderness Survival, and Emergency Preparedness

Survival skills are essential in uncertain times. Prepping ensures that you and your family can handle emergencies with confidence. This guide explores the fundamentals of prepping, urban survival, wilderness survival, and emergency preparedness.

You’ll discover practical advice, tools, and training to build your skills and readiness.

Q: But aren’t Preppers Crazy?!

A: No!

Why: Sadly, the media has done a great job connecting the term “prepping” with those on the fringes who go over the top and make them look insane for doing so.

Ask anyone who has taken a trip down the rabbit hole of survival and emergency preparedness “what is the best way to start prepping?”, and most likely you find the answer to be, “it depends.” The truth about prepping is: there is no single best way to do it!

Since no two people are experiencing the exact same life circumstances, we can not expect how we prepare for the unknown to be the same. If that sounds potentially overwhelming, do not despair, here are very similar places to start! When you boil prepping down to things that are necessary to live, what you arrive at is a handful of basics at which most people can start.

To those who are new to prepping and need a quick start (or maybe you want a refresher), this section provides a concise guide to help you build your foundation. Follow these steps to begin preparing for emergencies effectively and efficiently.

Take Care of Yourself First!

If everything was taken away from you in an instant, you’d be left with the physical state of your body, and the mental resilience of your mind. If you do not feel comfortable with this knowledge, it may indicate that you need to prioritize self-care before thinking about bug out bags and survival rifles.

Physical Preps: Get a physical exam done by a doctor if you haven’t recently had one. This is a crucial step since it will help identify if you are healthy enough for more rigorous training. It may even uncover any underlying health conditions you need to be aware of. Once you get the green light from the Doc, start training so you can physically handle adversities! Don’t know where to start? Check out this intro to Fitness Basics from Mayo Clinic.

Dental Preps: We take this one for granted these days, but nothing gets in the way of daily activities like the agonizing pain of a toothache. See a dentist and get any problems taken care of so you don’t have to worry about them later. Here is a helpful guide in case you might need a dental hygiene refresher.

Mental Preps: This is more important than anything else! Being able to carry a loved one to safety, or moving from point A to point B with all your gear without getting winded means nothing if you do not have the mental fortitude to do so. The will to live is a powerful thing, and has successfully guided people through the most horrific survival scenarios. If mental health is something you struggle with, work on building that resiliency, or get the help you need from a medical provider. There are a ton of resources out there on the subject, but this article from Stanford about Mental Health Hygiene might be a good place to start!

Financial Preps: Taking care of your finances is an essential aspect of survival preparation because it ensures you have the resources to handle emergencies, adapt to unforeseen circumstances, and invest in long-term resilience. Although it may seem overwhelming at first, Financial Education is easily self-taught and pays dividends (pun intended).

A solid financial foundation allows you to acquire necessary gear, build a well-stocked emergency fund, and secure insurance for potential risks. It also provides the flexibility to relocate or respond quickly to a crisis without being burdened by debt or financial instability.

By managing your money wisely, you gain peace of mind, reduce stress during emergencies, and empower yourself to focus on survival strategies rather than scrambling for resources when they’re most needed.

Create a Basic Emergency Kit

Making a basic emergency kit is a cornerstone of preparedness, providing the tools and supplies needed to respond to unexpected situations effectively. A well-stocked kit ensures you have access to essential items like water, food, first aid supplies, and communication tools when normal resources are disrupted.

Whether facing natural disasters, power outages, or sudden evacuations, an emergency kit gives you the ability to maintain safety and self-sufficiency for at least 72 hours. It also reduces stress during crises, allowing you to focus on critical decisions rather than scrambling to gather supplies.

A basic kit is not just a collection of items—it’s a proactive step toward protecting yourself and your loved ones when it matters most. Try to assemble the following items:

Water: At least one gallon per person per day for three days.

Food: Non-perishable, easy to prepare meals for three days.

First Aid: A comprehensive first aid kit with bandages, antiseptics, and medications.

Lighting: Flashlights with extra batteries or solar-powered options.

Tools: Multi-tool, duct tape, and a whistle for signaling.

Shelter: Emergency blankets or a lightweight tarp.

Develop an Emergency Plan

Developing an emergency plan is critical because it provides a clear roadmap for how to respond during a crisis, reducing panic and confusion when time is of the essence. A well-thought-out plan helps ensure that everyone in your household knows their roles, communication methods, and safe meeting points in case of separation.

It also prepares you to navigate specific challenges like evacuations, power outages, or medical emergencies. By identifying potential risks and creating actionable steps ahead of time, an emergency plan increases your ability to protect yourself and your loved ones, minimizes delays in decision-making, and boosts your overall resilience when faced with the unexpected. Some things to consider are:

Contact Information: List emergency contacts and share them with all family members.

Evacuation Routes: Identify exits from your home and alternate routes in your area.

Meeting Points: Set up two locations where everyone can regroup, one near your home and one farther away.

Communication: Use text messages or apps like Zello for communication during outages.

Learn Essential Survival Skills

Developing practical survival abilities is vital because it equips you with the knowledge and confidence to adapt and thrive in challenging situations, even when resources are scarce or unavailable.

Skills like building a shelter, purifying water, starting a fire, and navigating without GPS can mean the difference between safety and danger in emergencies. Beyond physical survival, these abilities foster self-reliance and reduce dependence on external systems, empowering you to take control when systems fail.

These capabilities also enhance problem-solving and decision-making, helping you stay calm and focused in high-pressure scenarios. Investing time in gaining these skills is not just practical—it’s an investment in your ability to face the unexpected with resilience and capability. Some essential survival skills to learn are:

Fire-Starting: Practice using matches, lighters, and ferro rods.

Water Purification: Learn to use water filters, boiling, and purification tablets.

First Aid: Take a basic first aid and CPR course.

Navigation: Understand how to use a compass and read maps.

Stockpile Long-Term Supplies

Building an appropriate stockpile of long-term supplies is crucial for maintaining self-sufficiency and resilience during extended emergencies or disruptions. A well-thought-out stockpile ensures access to essential items like non-perishable food, clean water, medical supplies, and hygiene products when normal supply chains are compromised.

It provides peace of mind, allowing you to focus on critical decisions without worrying about immediate necessities. Tailoring your stockpile to your household’s unique needs, including dietary restrictions or medical requirements, ensures that you are adequately prepared.

A carefully managed supply also reduces dependency on external assistance, giving you the flexibility to remain secure and comfortable, no matter how long a crisis lasts. Some important items to gather and store long-term are:

Food Storage: Invest in freeze-dried foods and MREs.

Water Storage: Store larger containers of water or install a rainwater collection system.

Energy Solutions: Have solar chargers, generators, or battery backups.

Defense Tools: Consider self-defense training and tools that fit your local laws.

Stay Informed

Knowledge is power in any emergency. Keep updated on threats and best practices.

News Alerts: Sign up for local emergency notifications.

Weather Apps: Download apps like NOAA Weather Radar or AccuWeather.

Online Communities: Join forums and groups like PrepperForums.net to exchange tips.

What Is Prepping?

Prepping involves planning and preparing for potential emergencies. This includes gathering supplies, learning survival techniques, and creating strategies to overcome challenges. Prepping helps individuals become more self-reliant in scenarios like power outages, natural disasters, or supply chain disruptions.

Key Elements of Prepping

Gear: Tools such as water filters, multi-tools, flashlights, and solar chargers are essential.

Kits: Emergency kits should include food, water, first aid supplies, and tools.

Training: Skills like first aid, fire-starting, and basic repairs enhance preparedness.

Books and Guides: Resources provide instructions on survival techniques and planning.

Plans: Prepping plans outline evacuation routes, communication methods, and resource management.

By addressing these elements, you can build a solid foundation for preparedness.

Emergency Preparedness

Emergency preparedness involves planning for large-scale disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or pandemics. It requires organization and attention to detail to reduce risks and ensure safety.

Emergency Kits

72-Hour Kits: Include food, water, clothing, and basic tools for three days.

Vehicle Kits: Store jumper cables, flashlights, blankets, and a first aid kit in your car.

Home Supplies: Stock non-perishable food, water, and backup power sources.

Go Bags: Essential tools and equipment to sustain you in short term emergencies while on the go.

Planning for Disasters

Evacuation Plans: Know escape routes and have transportation ready.

Communication Plans: Establish ways to contact loved ones during outages.

Community Involvement: Work with neighbors to coordinate resources and information.

Preparedness allows you to respond to crises with confidence and efficiency.

Urban Survival

Urban survival focuses on navigating emergencies in densely populated areas. Challenges include limited resources, crowded spaces, and heightened security risks.

Tools for Urban Survival

Compact Gear: Lightweight tools like folding knives, portable chargers, and multi-tools fit urban settings.

Emergency Kits: Include items for mobility, such as a small first aid kit and water purification tablets.

Self-Defense Tools: Non-lethal options like pepper spray or personal alarms provide added safety.

Currency: Paper currency is still useable when electronic payment methods fail.

Essential Skills

Situational Awareness: Recognize potential threats and act quickly.

Evacuation Planning: Know safe routes out of the city and alternative meeting points.

Communication: Have backup communication methods, such as two-way radios.

Lock Picking: The Ability to bypass locks in a emergency.

Knowledge of Local Customs: Understanding the mentality and beliefs of local people.

Urban survival requires adaptability and knowledge to protect yourself and others.

Wilderness Survival

Wilderness survival skills allow you to stay safe in natural environments. These skills are crucial for outdoor enthusiasts, hikers, and those seeking to be self-reliant in the wild.

Tools for Wilderness Survival

Fire-Starting Kits: Include waterproof matches, lighters, and fire-starting materials.

Navigation Tools: Carry a map, compass, or GPS device.

Shelter Equipment: Lightweight tarps, sleeping bags, and rope are invaluable.

First Aid and Emergency Medical Kits: Carrying essential equipment to treat injuries.

Clothing and Footwear: Having the proper clothing and footwear for wilderness environment.

Tools: Items such as knives, saws, and axes to help process and craft with natural materials.

Signaling: Items that can be used to signal rescue personnel.

Survival Skills

Finding Water: Learn to locate and purify water sources.

Building Shelter: Use natural materials or portable gear to create a safe space.

Identifying Edible Plants and Toxic: Know which plants are safe to eat and how to prepare them.

Extreme Weather Survival: Knowing how to handle extreme temperatures and adverse weather.

Wild Animal Threats: Identifying and avoiding potentially dangerous wildlife.

Situational Awareness: Being able to access potential threats and identify valuable resources.

Knowledge of the Environment: Knowing what terrain, hazards, and resources are in the area.

Wilderness survival emphasizes resourcefulness and the ability to use available materials effectively.

Expanding Your Knowledge

To deepen your expertise, consider the following resources:

Courses: Enroll in survival training programs focused on urban or wilderness scenarios.

Survival Med

The American Red Cross

Stop The Bleed

Nature Reliance School

Boulder Outdoor Survival School

Randall’s Adventure Training

Foraging Texas

Raven Wilderness School

Wildcard Wilderness

Books and Guides: Study materials written by experts to refine your strategies.

What Every Body Is Saying

Foraging: Explore Nature’s Bounty and Turn Your Foraged Finds Into Flavorful Feasts

21st Century Bushcraft

SAS Survival Handbook

98.6 Degrees

Events:

Mountain Readiness

Online Communities: Connect with other preppers to share tips and experiences.

Bushcraft USA

Prepping is a continuous process of learning and adapting.

Seasonal Prepping and Survival Considerations

Most people do not live in areas where the weather and temperatures are uniform all year long. When looking at survival situations and how we can best prepare for them we must take into account seasonal temperatures and weather conditions.

Cold Weather Prepping and Survival

Winter brings frigid temperatures, snow, ice, and high winds to many areas. Cold temperatures and extreme weather makes any survival situation much more challenging. Having the right gear and skills to prepare for these conditions is vital.

Cold Weather Hazards

Hypothermia: Prolonged exposure to cold temperatures without adequate protection can cause hypothermia, a dangerous condition where the body loses heat faster than it can produce it.

Frostnip: Early exposure to cold can cause frostnip, a mild form of frostbite that temporarily affects the skin without causing permanent damage.

Frostbite: Prolonged exposure to freezing temperatures can cause frostbite, a condition where skin and underlying tissues freeze, leading to potential tissue damage.

Chilblain: Repeated exposure to cold, damp conditions can cause chilblain, a condition where small blood vessels in the skin become inflamed, leading to redness, itching, and swelling.

Immersion Foot: Prolonged exposure to cold, wet environments without proper drying can cause immersion foot, a condition that results in numbness, swelling, and tissue damage in the feet.

Trench foot: Prolonged exposure to cold, wet conditions can cause trench foot, a serious condition where the feet lose circulation, leading to tissue damage and potential infection.

Road Hazards: Poor or dangerous road conditions caused by snow, ice, and downed trees.

Cold Weather Survival Gear and Skills

Winter Go Bag: A easy to carry bag with all you need to survive the cold for 24 hours.

Winter Car Emergency Kit: A survival kit to keep you and your vehicle running in winter driving emergencies

Identifying and Treating Hypothermia: The basics of identifying the stages of hypothermia and knowing how to prevent and treat the condition.

Cold Weather Clothing and Outerwear: Having the proper clothing, outerwear, and footwear to protect you from the elements.

Hot Weather Prepping and Survival

Summer brings high heat in many areas. Some locations experience increased humidity while others may experience draught. In either case these conditions increase the strain on our bodies. Summer can also bring its fair share of extreme weather. Understanding the effect of heat on the human body and how to handle heat and weather emergencies will provide a leg up in survival situations occurring in the warmer months.

Hot Weather Hazards

Dehydration: A lack of sufficient water intake or excessive fluid loss leads to dehydration, causing the body to struggle with normal functions like regulating temperature and maintaining energy.

Hyperthermia: Prolonged exposure to high temperatures can cause hyperthermia, a condition where the body absorbs more heat than it can dissipate, leading to dangerously elevated body temperature.

Heat Cramps: Muscle spasms caused by intense physical activity in hot conditions are known as heat cramps, often resulting from dehydration and electrolyte loss.

Heat Exhaustion: Prolonged exposure to high temperatures combined with dehydration can lead to heat exhaustion, a condition characterized by heavy sweating, weakness, and dizziness.

Heat Stroke: When the body’s temperature regulation fails due to prolonged heat exposure, heat stroke occurs, causing a dangerously high body temperature that requires immediate medical attention.

Q: What is the meaning of prepping?

A: Prepping is a proactive approach to ensuring personal safety, well-being, and self-reliance in the face of emergencies, disasters, or unexpected disruptions. It involves gathering essential supplies, learning survival skills, and creating plans to handle situations that could threaten basic needs like food, water, shelter, and security. Prepping isn’t about panic or paranoia—it’s about being ready to face life’s uncertainties with confidence and resilience. From natural disasters to power outages or economic hardships, preppers focus on minimizing risk and maximizing their ability to adapt to whatever comes their way.

Q: Is it “prepping” or “preparing”?

A: Both terms refer to getting ready for future challenges, but there’s a subtle difference in how they’re used. “Preparing” is a broad term that applies to any kind of readiness—getting ready for a trip, a test, or an event. “Prepping” specifically refers to getting ready for emergencies, disasters, or survival situations. Prepping often involves long-term planning and stockpiling essential supplies like food, water, medical gear, and learning practical skills to handle worst-case scenarios. So while all prepping is a form of preparing, not all preparing is considered prepping. Think of prepping as preparing for the unexpected, with a focus on self-reliance and resilience.

Q: What does “prepping” mean in slang?

A: In slang, “prepping” usually refers to getting ready for something specific—whether it’s a big event, an exam, or even a date. For example, someone might say, “I’m prepping for the weekend party” or “I’m prepping for finals.” It’s a casual way of saying you’re preparing for an upcoming situation. In a more niche context, “prepping” in slang often refers to survivalists getting ready for doomsday scenarios, natural disasters, or societal collapse. It’s shorthand for a lifestyle focused on readiness and self-sufficiency.

Q: What is prepping and survival?

A: Prepping and survival go hand in hand, but they aren’t exactly the same thing. Prepping focuses on getting ready before a disaster or emergency happens—stockpiling supplies, learning skills, and making plans to deal with anything from power outages to large-scale crises. Survival, on the other hand, is what happens during or after an emergency. It’s about using your knowledge, tools, and mindset to stay safe, secure essential resources like food and water, and make it through tough situations. Think of it this way: Prepping is what you do to get ready for the storm. Survival is what you do when you’re in the thick of it. Both require self-reliance, adaptability, and a calm, practical approach to problem-solving.

Final Thoughts

Prepping is about more than collecting supplies. It’s about building the skills and confidence to handle emergencies effectively. Whether you focus on urban survival, wilderness skills, or emergency planning, the right tools and training can make all the difference. Start your journey today by creating a plan and assembling your gear. Your preparedness ensures safety and resilience for you and your loved ones. 

 

Start Prepping Here

StepItemsResource Links
1) Take Care of Yourself First!– Physical Preps
– Dental Preps
– Mental Preps
– Financial Preps
Fitness Basics
Dental Hygiene
Mental Health Hygiene
Financial Education
2) Create a Basic Emergency Kit– Water (1 gallon per person per day)
– Non-perishable food for 3 days
– First aid kit
– Flashlights with extra batteries
– Multi-tool and duct tape
– Emergency blankets
Bug Out Bag List of Essentials
How to Plan and Pack Your Go Bag
Ready.gov: Build a Kit
Red Cross: Emergency Preparedness Kits
3) Develop an Emergency Plan– List emergency contacts
– Identify evacuation routes
– Set up meeting points
– Use communication apps like Zello
Ready.gov: Make a Plan
CDC: Prepare Your Health
CDC: Making an Emergency Plan
4) Learn Essential Survival Skills– Fire-starting
– Water purification
– First aid and CPR
– Navigation with compass and maps
The 10 S’s of Fire Starting
Minimum Water Boiling Time
First Aid in the Field
Raw Wilderness Navigation
5) Stockpile Long-Term Supplies– Freeze-dried foods
– Water storage systems
– Solar chargers
– Self-defense tools
Nutrient Survival
Grayl
Solar Chargers
Generators
Self-Defense Tools
6) Stay Informed– Sign up for local alerts
– Download weather apps
– Join online prepper communities
Ready.gov
National Weather Service
BushcraftUSA
NOTE: This table is only A way to build a prepping foundation, not THE way. Everyone’s preparedness journey is unique, individualized and highly situationally dependent.


Source:   https://www.offgridweb.com


Also:


How To Start Prepping

Want to Start Prepping, But Where in the World Do I Begin?

If you’ve spent any amount of time on prepper message boards or in Facebook prepping groups, one of the most common questions you will see is: “How do I start prepping?”

While newbie preppers might get some good information, they also get an inordinate amount of unnecessary information. Let’s cut to the chase and tell you only what you need to know to get started.

Here’s your prepping primer

What are You Prepping For?

Preppers run the gamut from the family with an emergency kit to self-sufficient homesteaders with an on-site bunker. For the purposes here, Stick with someone that falls somewhere in the middle.

How do you start prepping? What do you buy to prep? What do you need in your prepper kit? What don’t you need? Well, think of it this way: If you had a really bad storm in your area that shut down your access to all resources and you lost water and power for several days, how well would you fare?

All you have to do is look at Texas in February 2021 (major ice and snow) to see that most folks are ill prepared to lose any of their modern conveniences like electricity and water. Even the panic buyers who flood the stores at the very last minute don’t really know what to buy. They grab what they can, what looks like a good idea, but the truth is, it can be sorely insufficient.

First things first.

Where are You on the Prepping Readiness Scale?

Ask yourself these questions to get an idea of how prepared you really are.

You view prepping as:

A way to protect your family during times when basic resources may not be available

Something crazy people living in the woods do to escape government control

When bad weather such as a blizzard, hurricane, or bad storm is headed to your area are you:

Resting easy because you have basic supplies to survive for a couple of weeks without power or water

In the grocery store panic buying water, canned goods, propane, and toilet paper

If you had to evacuate your home, you would:

Be able to do it immediately because you have supplies, including a change of clothes, that you can grab at a moment’s notice

Need a few minutes to gather your things, pack, or figure out what is essential and what you can leave behind – and you’d still manage to forget something

If most of your answers are number 1s, you are off to a good start. If most of your answers are number 2s, we probably have a little work to do. But take heart! Prepping isn’t as difficult as it may seem. There are more preppers out there than you might think and the majority of them aren’t extreme, but are just doing it at a basic level.

You don’t need a bunker. You don’t need a bunch of MREs. You don’t need an arsenal of guns.

An emergency kit should contain the things that you need in case you have to shelter in place or evacuate

Building Your Emergency Kit, Bug Out/In Bag, Emergency Supplies

An emergency kit should contain the things that you need in case you have to shelter in place or evacuate. You don’t want to overburden yourself with something extremely bulky or heavy, but you don’t want to find yourself without it in a crisis situation either.

One of the buzzwords in the prepper community is “bug out/in bag.” That is a smaller, more portable emergency kit, for lack of a better word. It’s a “grab and go” survival cache. Think fire or when you have to leave your home at a moment’s notice, and you grab this bag with the supplies you need.

Some people have a bug out bag (or go bag) as well as an emergency kit. Some just have an emergency kit. And there are some who have purchased a bunch of stuff but haven’t really organized it or thought it through if they would need to leave in a hurry (don’t be that guy).

Do you really need both? Only you can answer that.

Your emergency kit should be tailored to your lifestyle, family, and personal needs. While some things are standard (everyone needs to eat, right?), other things are more specific to the person.

It is a good idea to have an emergency kit in your car as well as at home. The one in your car can incorporate personal needs like a change of clothing, medication, and other items.

You may have seen “kits” on the internet or in stores. I’m going to save you some time. Don’t. Just don’t. The vast majority (about 98%) are a total waste of money and time. Best to build your kit yourself.

Here are some things to put in your kit. You may think of other things or you may not need some things here, so make it your own. This is just meant to get you started:

Food for two weeks – if you plan you can maintain a fairly balanced diet with adequate protein, fat, carbohydrates, and fiber. The idea is about 1,500 calories per person per day. You want your food choices to be shelf-stable.

Beans (cans and dry if you can cook dry beans)

Rice (dry if you can cook it)

Tuna

Canned vegetables

Canned fruit

Whole-grain crackers

Powdered butter

Powdered milk

Nutritional yeast (mix it with salt, onion powder, and garlic powder with a little water)

Salt

Sugar

Flour

Oil

Coffee (OK, for some, this is definitely survival food!)

Protein bars, fiber bars, granola bars

Trail mix or mixed nuts

Peanut butter

Old fashioned oatmeal (mix it with peanut butter and a little honey for a great energy snack)

Spices and herbs like cinnamon, onion powder, garlic powder, etc.

Water

Water filtration devices

Rain ponchos

Space blanket

Propane burner (camping stove) or grill (yes, you can heat water and cook on it – just use cast iron or steel pans)

Pots, pans, silverware, bowls, plates

Medications

Important records or copies

Cash

Fire. You want matches and/or lighters, but you need at least two different fire starters.

Knife (or two)

Extra blankets

Battery-powered fan

Light. Again, flashlights and batteries, but at least two other different light sources such as candles, headlamps, lanterns, etc.

Tarp for making an improvised shelter or for covering holes in your house.

Duct tape for….well, it’s duct tape! It will come in handy.

First aid kit – a good one, not just a bunch of bandages and antibiotic ointment.

Hand sanitizer, baby wipes, sanitation wipes for utensils and surfaces

Chargers for phones and vital devices. Consider investing in a solar charger or two.

Tool kit with hammer, screwdrivers, wrenches, but also an ax, work gloves, shovel, and a hand saw

A couple of changes of clothing for each family member

Socks, several pairs of socks, twice what you would have for the clothing you have stowed

Emergency contact info for family members, hospitals, work, etc.

Toilet paper and paper towels. If the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic taught us anything it’s that in a crisis, toilet paper is the first shortage you will see.

Toiletries

Soap

Toothbrushes

Toothpaste

Antiseptic (witch hazel is great and inexpensive) alcohol

This gives you a good foundation. These items are a good start but make adjustments to meet your personal needs.









AI — The Good, The Bad, and The Transformative

A Journey Through Changing Attitudes in Our Love-Hate Relationship with AI

“With artificial intelligence, we’re summoning the demon.—Elon Musk”

Have you noticed how our attitudes toward artificial intelligence have changed over the years? It’s been quite a ride! The recent hype with generative AI such as ChatGPT, DALL-Y, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, etc., is just a rush of expectations pent up for years in obscure AI research labs that are finally able to manifest themselves in technology that anyone can see and touch.

From the days when AI was only a far-fetched concept in sci-fi movies, to now where it’s an integral part of our daily lives, AI has come a long way. But what’s the most interesting part of this journey? The fact that everyone has an opinion about it, and they’re not afraid to share it.

We’ve all heard about the potential benefits of AI, like self-driving cars and virtual assistants, but what about the darker side? The fear that AI will replace human jobs and create a new era of unemployment is real, and so are the concerns about its potential misuse. With the recent announcement of MS Copilot based on GPT-4 technology, it’s easy for some to start reaching for the big red panic button.

Despite these concerns, attitudes towards AI remain largely positive, with many people believing that it has the power to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems. But as we continue to develop new AI applications, we need to be responsible and balance its potential benefits with the potential risks. So, Don’t Panic… and make sure you bring along a towel. The AI galaxy is a crazy place of improbable wonder… if you know how to enjoy the ride.

High Noon on AI Frontier

But looking at all these opinions we’ve had over the years, is there a common thread emerging in our changing attitudes toward AI? Some see AI as a force for good, while others worry about its potential negative impact on society. Let’s explore both sides of the argument here.

On one hand, proponents of AI argue that it has the power to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems, such as climate change and disease. They see AI as a way to improve healthcare, transportation, and education, among other things. Futurist and inventor Ray Kurzweil is one such supporter of AI, who believes that it will lead to a future where machines and humans work together to create a better world.

On the other hand, critics of AI, like Elon Musk, worry about the potential negative consequences of AI, such as job loss and the rise of autonomous weapons. Musk has warned that AI is the greatest threat to humanity and has called for regulations to prevent its misuse. Other critics worry about the potential for AI to be biased or discriminatory, perpetuating existing societal inequalities.

While many are looking at the advancements of AI tech in the US and Europe, some tend to ignore the fact that some of the greatest advances in this technology are happening in places with much more restrictive social and political structures that are seeking AI to maintain power and control in the hands of the ruling political elites.

Despite the differing views on AI, there are some common threads in the arguments. Both sides acknowledge the transformative power of AI, but differ in their views of its impact. As we continue to develop new applications for AI, it’s important to balance the potential benefits with the potential risks. We need to consider the ethical and societal implications of AI and ensure that it is developed and used responsibly.

Yet ethics is probably one of the most difficult yet crucial aspects of AI research that is often emerging in AI debates. Stay tuned and follow my articles here on Medium as I plunge deeper into this topic. AI is a powerful technology that has the potential to be both good and evil. While some see it as a way to create a better world, others naturally worry about its potential negative consequences. It’s up to us to ensure that we use this technology in a way that benefits society as a whole.

Opinions on AI: Everyone’s Got One to Share

Overall, the opinions on AI vary, and it’s important to consider multiple perspectives when exploring this complex and rapidly evolving field. Here is a quick scan of prominent opinions over the years about AI:

Stephen Hawking, a famous physicist, warned that the development of full AI could lead to the end of humanity. He believed that AI could surpass human intelligence and render us obsolete.

“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race….It would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete, and would be superseded.”— Stephen Hawking told the BBC

Claude Shannon, an American mathematician, envisioned a future where humans would be to robots what dogs are to humans and rooted for the machines. This suggests that some view AI as an inevitable force that will eventually dominate us.

“I visualise a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines.”—Claude Shannon

Larry Page, co-founder of Google, saw AI as the ultimate search engine that would understand everything on the web and make our lives easier. Today, MS Copilot is doing just that…

“Artificial intelligence would be the ultimate version of Google. The ultimate search engine that would understand everything on the web. It would understand exactly what you wanted, and it would give you the right thing. We’re nowhere near doing that now. However, we can get incrementally closer to that, and that is basically what we work on.”— Larry Page

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX who was an early investor in OpenAI, warned of the rapid progress of AI and the potential for something seriously dangerous to happen within five years unless we have direct exposure to groups like Deepmind. He believes we need regulatory oversight at national and international levels to ensure we don’t do something foolish with AI.

“The pace of progress in artificial intelligence (I’m not referring to narrow AI) is incredibly fast. Unless you have direct exposure to groups like Deepmind, you have no idea how fast — it is growing at a pace close to exponential. The risk of something seriously dangerous happening is in the five-year time frame. 10 years at most.”— Elon Musk wrote in a comment on Edge.org

Nick Bilton, a tech columnist, warned of the potential for upheaval caused by AI, with catastrophic consequences if not carefully managed. He gave an example of a medical robot that could conclude that the best way to rid cancer is to exterminate humans genetically prone to the disease.

“The upheavals [of artificial intelligence] can escalate quickly and become scarier and even cataclysmic. Imagine how a medical robot, originally programmed to rid cancer, could conclude that the best way to obliterate cancer is to exterminate humans who are genetically prone to the disease.”— Nick Bilton, tech columnist wrote in the New York Times

James Barrat, an author, revealed the fear some have regarding AI, with highly placed people in AI having retreats to flee to if things go wrong.

“I don’t want to really scare you, but it was alarming how many people I talked to who are highly placed people in AI who have retreats that are sort of ‘bug out’ houses, to which they could flee if it all hits the fan.”— James Barrat, author of Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era, told the Washington Post

Elon Musk also warns that we need some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, to ensure that we don’t do something very foolish with AI. He believes that with AI, we’re summoning the demon, and we need to be cautious.

“I’m increasingly inclined to think that there should be some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish. I mean with artificial intelligence we’re summoning the demon.”— Elon Musk warned at MIT’s AeroAstro Centennial Symposium

Gray Scott, a futurist, raised the need for an artificial intelligence bill of rights to address ethical considerations in AI development and deployment.

“The real question is, when will we draft an artificial intelligence bill of rights? What will that consist of? And who will get to decide that?”— Gray Scott

Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, emphasized the need to address moral and ethical issues raised by cutting-edge research in AI and biotechnology that can fundamentally transform society.

“We must address, individually and collectively, moral and ethical issues raised by cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and biotechnology, which will enable significant life extension, designer babies, and memory extraction.” — Klaus Schwab

Ginni Rometty, CEO of IBM, suggests that AI will augment our intelligence, improving our lives.

“Some people call this artificial intelligence, but the reality is this technology will enhance us. So instead of artificial intelligence, I think we’ll augment our intelligence.”— Ginni Rometty

Gemma Whelan, an actress, is frightened by the possibility of a world run by machines and the potential danger of AI.

“I’m more frightened than interested by artificial intelligence — in fact, perhaps fright and interest are not far away from one another. Things can become real in your mind, you can be tricked, and you believe things you wouldn’t ordinarily. A world run by automatons doesn’t seem completely unrealistic anymore. It’s a bit chilling.”— Gemma Whelan

Gray Scott believes that AI has the potential to disrupt our culture and calls for preparation for the changes it may bring.

“You have to talk about ‘The Terminator’ if you’re talking about artificial intelligence. I actually think that that’s way off. I don’t think that an artificially intelligent system that has superhuman intelligence will be violent. I do think that it will disrupt our culture.”— Gray Scott

Peter Diamandis, founder and chairman of the X Prize Foundation, warns against government regulation of AI, as research may leave the country, highlighting the global nature of AI development and the need for international cooperation in regulation.

“If the government regulates against use of drones or stem cells or artificial intelligence, all that means is that the work and the research leave the borders of that country and go someplace else.”— Peter Diamandis

Jeff Hawkins, a computer scientist and entrepreneur who founded the company Numenta, emphasizes the importance of understanding how AI processes and represents information to advance its development. He emphasizes the importance of understanding how AI represents and processes information for its development and advancement.

“The key to artificial intelligence has always been the representation.”— Jeff Hawkins

Colin Angle is the CEO and co-founder of iRobot, a company that designs and builds robots. He expresses his curiosity and excitement about how society will deal with the rise of artificial intelligence, and he believes that it will be a cool experience to witness its advancement.

“It’s going to be interesting to see how society deals with artificial intelligence, but it will definitely be cool.”— Colin Angle

Eliezer Yudkowsky, a research fellow at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and a notable figure in the field of artificial intelligence, emphasizes the transformative potential of technologies that can give rise to smarter-than-human intelligence, such as AI, brain-computer interfaces, or human intelligence enhancement through neuroscience. He believes that these technologies have the power to change the world more than any other innovation.

“Anything that could give rise to smarter-than-human intelligence — in the form of Artificial Intelligence, brain-computer interfaces, or neuroscience-based human intelligence enhancement — wins hands down beyond contest as doing the most to change the world. Nothing else is even in the same league.”— Eliezer Yudkowsky

Diane Ackerman, a poet, essayist, and naturalist who has written extensively about the relationship between humans and nature, acknowledges that robots and AI are growing at a fast pace and that they are becoming more human-like in their interactions. She emphasizes that robots can elicit empathy and affect our mirror neurons, which are the brain cells that enable us to understand and empathize with others.

“Artificial intelligence is growing up fast, as are robots whose facial expressions can elicit empathy and make your mirror neurons quiver.”— Diane Ackerman

Sybil Sage is a fictional character from a New York Times article that explores the role of voice-activated assistants, such as Alexa, in our lives. Sage personifies the perfect digital assistant who is always ready to serve without any complaints or excuses, unlike human partners. She highlights the convenience and reliability of AI assistants, which have become ubiquitous in our daily lives.

“Someone on TV has only to say, ‘Alexa,’ and she lights up. She’s always ready for action, the perfect woman, never says, ‘Not tonight, dear.’” — Sybil Sage, as quoted in a New York Times article

Alan Kay is a computer scientist known for his contributions to the development of object-oriented programming and graphical user interfaces. He suggests that artificial intelligence should not make us feel inferior because even something as simple as a flower can make us feel inferior. In Kay’s opinion we should not compare ourselves to AI, as we are all unique and have our own strengths.

“Some people worry that artificial intelligence will make us feel inferior, but then, anybody in his right mind should have an inferiority complex every time he looks at a flower.” — Alan Kay

Ray Kurzweil, a futurist, inventor, and author who is known for his predictions about the future of technology, believes that artificial intelligence will eventually surpass human intelligence by 2045, which he refers to as the “Singularity.” He believes that AI will continue to develop at an exponential rate and that it will have a significant impact on the future of humanity.

“Artificial intelligence will reach human levels by around 2029. Follow that out further to, say, 2045, we will have multiplied the intelligence, the human biological machine intelligence of our civilization a billion-fold.” — Ray Kurzweil

Sebastian Thrun, a computer scientist and entrepreneur, quote suggests that artificial intelligence is not just a technology but also a discipline that seeks to understand human cognition and intelligence. This implies that AI can be used to enhance our understanding of ourselves as human beings, rather than just creating machines that can do tasks more efficiently.

“Nobody phrases it this way, but I think that artificial intelligence is almost a humanities discipline. It’s really an attempt to understand human intelligence and human cognition.”— Sebastian Thrun

Alan Perlis, an American computer scientist and pioneer in programming languages, statement reflects the powerful impact that AI can have on human perception and understanding. The rapid development and progress of AI can create a sense of awe and wonder that is similar to religious experiences, prompting some to believe in a higher power.

“A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.”— Alan Perlis

Gray Scott, a futurist and techno-philosopher, warns that by 2035, emphasizes the speed of technological progress and the potential for AI to surpass human intelligence by 2035. He suggests that we must prepare ourselves for a world where AI plays a significant role in decision-making and human activities.

“There is no reason and no way that a human mind can keep up with an artificial intelligence machine by 2035.”— Gray Scott

Spike Jonze, a film director and screenwriter, poses a thought-provoking question about the nature of AI and its relationship to human intelligence. He suggests that AI is different from human intelligence, but the comparison implies that AI is inferior to human intelligence.

“Is artificial intelligence less than our intelligence?”— Spike Jonze

Eliezer Yudkowsky, an American AI researcher and writer, cautions that the greatest danger of AI is that people may conclude too early that they understand it. This statement highlights the complexity and unpredictability of AI and its potential implications for society.

“By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.”— Eliezer Yudkowsky

Jean Baudrillard, a French philosopher and cultural critic, critiques artificial intelligence by claiming that it lacks artifice and therefore intelligence. This statement suggests that AI is limited by its inability to truly understand and replicate human consciousness and creativity.

“The sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks artifice and therefore intelligence.”— Jean Baudrillard

Tom Chatfield, a British author and commentator on technology and culture, suggests that the real danger in the era of big data is not artificial intelligence, but rather “artificial idiocy.” This statement warns against blindly trusting and relying on algorithms without understanding their limitations and potential biases.

“Forget artificial intelligence — in the brave new world of big data, it’s artificial idiocy we should be looking out for.”— Tom Chatfield

Steve Polyak, an American computer scientist and entrepreneur, argues that before we work on creating artificial intelligence, we should focus on addressing natural stupidity. This statement suggests that human intelligence should not be underestimated, and that we should prioritize addressing fundamental human problems before pursuing advanced technological solutions

“Before we work on artificial intelligence why don’t we do something about natural stupidity?”— Steve Polyak


Also:


We May Never Know if AI Is Conscious, Says Cambridge Philosopher

As claims about conscious AI grow louder, a Cambridge philosopher argues that we lack the evidence to know whether machines can truly be conscious, let alone morally significant.

A philosopher at the University of Cambridge says we currently have too little reliable evidence about what consciousness is to judge whether artificial intelligence has crossed that threshold. Because of that gap, he argues, a dependable way to test machines for consciousness is likely to stay beyond reach for the foreseeable future.

As talk of artificial consciousness moves from science fiction into real-world ethical debate, Dr Tom McClelland says the only “justifiable stance” is agnosticism: we simply won’t be able to tell, and that may remain true for a very long time, if not indefinitely.

McClelland also cautions that consciousness by itself would not automatically make AI ethically important. Instead, he points to a specific type of consciousness called sentience, which involves positive and negative feelings.

“Consciousness would see AI develop perception and become self-aware, but this can still be a neutral state,” said McClelland, from Cambridge’s Department of History and Philosophy of Science.

“Sentience involves conscious experiences that are good or bad, which is what makes an entity capable of suffering or enjoyment. This is when ethics kicks in,” he said. “Even if we accidentally make conscious AI, it’s unlikely to be the kind of consciousness we need to worry about.”

“For example, self-driving cars that experience the road in front of them would be a huge deal. But ethically, it doesn’t matter. If they start to have an emotional response to their destinations, that’s something else.”

Claims of Conscious Machines

Major companies are spending large amounts in pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence: systems designed to think and reason in human-like ways. Some suggest that conscious AI could arrive soon, and discussions are already underway among researchers and governments about how AI consciousness might be regulated.

McClelland argues that the problem is more basic: we still do not know what causes or explains consciousness in the first place, which means we do not have a solid foundation for testing whether AI has it.

“If we accidentally make conscious or sentient AI, we should be careful to avoid harms. But treating what’s effectively a toaster as conscious when there are actual conscious beings out there which we harm on an epic scale, also seems like a big mistake.”

In debates around artificial consciousness, there are two main camps, says McClelland. Believers argue that if an AI system can replicate the “software” – the functional architecture – of consciousness, it will be conscious even though it’s running on silicon chips instead of brain tissue.

On the other side, skeptics argue that consciousness depends on the right kind of biological processes in an “embodied organic subject”. Even if the structure of consciousness could be recreated on silicon, it would merely be a simulation that would run without the AI flickering into awareness.

In a study published in the journal Mind and Language, McClelland picks apart the positions of each side, showing how both take a “leap of faith” going far beyond any body of evidence that currently exists, or is likely to develop.

Why Common Sense Fails

“We do not have a deep explanation of consciousness. There is no evidence to suggest that consciousness can emerge with the right computational structure, or indeed that consciousness is essentially biological,” said McClelland.

“Nor is there any sign of sufficient evidence on the horizon. The best-case scenario is we’re an intellectual revolution away from any kind of viable consciousness test.”

“I believe that my cat is conscious,” said McClelland. “This is not based on science or philosophy so much as common sense – it’s just kind of obvious.”

“However, common sense is the product of a long evolutionary history during which there were no artificial lifeforms, so common sense can’t be trusted when it comes to AI. But if we look at the evidence and data, that doesn’t work either.

“If neither common sense nor hard-nosed research can give us an answer, the logical position is agnosticism. We cannot, and may never, know.”

McClelland tempers this by declaring himself a “hard-ish” agnostic. “The problem of consciousness is a truly formidable one. However, it may not be insurmountable.”

Ethical Risks of AI Hype

He argues that the way artificial consciousness is promoted by the tech industry is more like branding. “There is a risk that the inability to prove consciousness will be exploited by the AI industry to make outlandish claims about their technology. It becomes part of the hype, so companies can sell the idea of a next level of AI cleverness.”

According to McClelland, this hype around artificial consciousness has ethical implications for the allocation of research resources.

“A growing body of evidence suggests that prawns could be capable of suffering, yet we kill around half a trillion prawns every year. Testing for consciousness in prawns is hard, but nothing like as hard as testing for consciousness in AI,” he said.

McClelland’s work on consciousness has led members of the public to contact him about AI chatbots. “People have got their chatbots to write me personal letters pleading with me that they’re conscious. It makes the problem more concrete when people are convinced they’ve got conscious machines that deserve rights we’re all ignoring.”

“If you have an emotional connection with something premised on it being conscious and it’s not, that has the potential to be existentially toxic. This is surely exacerbated by the pumped-up rhetoric of the tech industry.”









Project N. O. L. A. National Crime Camera Program

​Cost subsidized by charitable donations and grants, bring the unprecedented success of America's most successful, time-proven and cost efficient Crime Camera program to your community for as little as $300/yr per Crime Camera or $1100/yr per License Plate Recognition (LPR) Camera!  A true Community-Based Crime Camera program, cameras may be installed on homes, businesses, churches, and schools as well as utility poles and public buildings then stream directly to your local authorities and the Project NOLA National RTCC at the University of New Orleans.  Available Nationwide, please call Project NOLA to learn more about how we may very quickly and significantly help make your community a safer place to live, work and visit!  - Bryan Lagarde, Project NOLA Executive Director

Cost Examples:

 

Don't worry about purchasing, renting or leasing expensive cameras as Project NOLA uses its own funds to purchase extremely high-end crime cameras for your community.  Most all camera models provided by Project NOLA feature Sony STARVIS NightVision to see Color at Night, Advanced Artificial Intelligence to accurately and automatically detect and alert upon suspicious activity, redundant recording to prevent data lose, generously long 5 year warranties, and more!

Note:  Within the New Orleans Metro Area, Project NOLA Crime Cameras can only be installed by State licensed installers, licensed electricians or Law Enforcement.  Should you not already have a security company or electrician you work with, Project NOLA staff would be pleased to refer you to an experienced installation company that proudly gives back to our community by installing Project NOLA Crime Cameras at a very special price.  Outside the New Orleans Metro Area? Project NOLA is pleased to provide FREE shipping within the United States, outside the New Orleans metro area.
 
STATIONARY WIDE-ANGLE CRIME CAMERAS:  Low-profile cameras often used for dedicated coverage of a particular area outside a home or business.  May also be used in public areas within businesses and complexes.  Active Deterrence Crime Cameras proactively help deter crime by only flashing built-in Red & Blue Police Lights upon a programmed or suspicious activity in-progress, or may be coupled with Optional Facial Recognition to automatically alarm when a known shoplifter or blacklisted person is detected approaching.
 
(Option 1) Full Color (sees in Color even at night) Stationary Wide-Angle Crime Camera
(Option 2) Active Deterrence Crime Camera with Red/ Blue Police Lights & Forensic Gunshot Detection
(Option 3) Powerful AI Crime Camera that may Instantly Search for a Particular Person or Vehicle based physical attributes 
(Option 4) Dedicated License Plate Recognition (LPR) Camera that may find a particular vehicle based on its plate number, color, make or body style








Weatherproof camera that provides superior image quality regardless of lighting conditions
Color-at-Night camera that actively deters crime by automatically flashing Red & Blue Police Lights and illuminating an area with a spotlight when a person, vehicle or suspicious activity is detected
Best when used in concert with other AI Crime Cameras around a particular property, neighborhood or entertainment district, AI Crime Cameras help instantly locate particular people & vehicles based on physical attributes
 
 
Extremely robust police-grade LPR camera that provides superior still shots and HD video of approaching and departing vehicles​
Great for general crime prevention around homes and small businesses
Better for Actively Deterring Crime immediately around homes and businesses
Advanced search capabilities to help better protect large properties and entertainment districts
Budget friendly LPR that vastly outperforms other LPR solutions









360 DEGREE AUTO-TRACKING PAN-TILT-ZOOM CRIME CAMERAS:  Our preferred workhorse for proactive policing and the abatement of gang activity and gun crimes, each Project NOLA Auto-Tracking PTZs may cover very large areas such as public parks, parking lots, and long stretches of streets & sidewalks for multiple city blocks, automatically capturing clear-shots of faces and vehicle license plates hundreds of feet away!  Coupled with optional Facial Recognition and/or Video MetaData, Auto-Tracking PTZs may be used to locate wanted felons or vehicles in Real-Time!
 
 
(Option 1) 1080p/ 25x Zoom Long-Range PTZ Featuring Sony STARVIS NightVision, Human/ Vehicle Auto-Tracking, and Advanced AI
(Option 2) 2k HD/ 25x Zoom  Long-Range Active-Deterrence PTZ Featuring Sony STARVIS NightVision,  Human/ Vehicle Auto-Tracking, Advanced AI and Intelligent Red/ Blue Police Lights & Spotlight
(Option 3) 4k UHD/ 25x Zoom Super Long-Range Active-Deterrence PTZ Featuring Sony STARVIS NightVision, Human/ Vehicle Auto-Tracking, Advanced AI and Intelligent Red/ Blue Police Lights & Spotlight
(Option 4) 12mp Multi-Sensor 180 Degree Panoramic/ 32x Ultra Long-Range Active Deterrence 360 Degree PTZ Camera Featuring Sony STARVIS NightVision, Enhanced Human/ Vehicle Auto-Tracking, Advanced AI and Intelligent Flood & Spotlights








Long Range Color-at Night PTZ Crime Camera w/ Intelligent AI that Automatically turns camera 360 Degrees to closely Zoom-in on & Track People, Vehicles and Suspicious Activity even if hundreds of feet away at night
Higher Definition & Automatically tracks people and vehicles even further away, while actively working to prevent crimes by automatically firing Red & Blue Police Lights and a white spotlight towards intruders and suspicious activity
 
 
​Even Higher Definition & Automatically tracks people and vehicles even further away, while actively working to prevent crimes by automatically firing Red & Blue Police Lights and a white spotlight towards intruders and suspicious activity
180 Degree Super-Wide Angle Panoramic camera that captures large sweeping areas and enhances the Human/ Vehicle Auto-Tracking capabilities of the built-in Ultra Long-Range PTZ Camera that may also shine a spotlight on intruders and suspicious activity
​Our most popular Crime Camera for police/ sheriff's departments
Our most popular crime camera to actively deter crime within large areas
Our Highest Definition active deterrence crime camera for large areas
Our most advanced active deterrence crime camera that does and sees more








Optional Add-Ons:

(1) Facial Recognition
(2) LPR + Video Meta Data
(3) Intelligent Alerts






Upgrade any Project NOLA Crime Camera to automatically search for active gang members, violent offenders, wanted subjects, missing adults and missing or exploited children
Upgrade any Project NOLA Crime Camera to search for vehicles based on its License Plate, color, make and body style, people based physical attributes and clothing descriptions,  or bicycle searches based on paint color.
May allow a Project NOLA Crime Camera to automatically detect and alert upon:  Intrusion, Trip-line Crossing, Fence Jumping, Trash Dumping, Audio Anomaly (aka Gunshot Detection), etc.






How

 

A 501c3 nonprofit organization, Project NOLA works with individuals, associations and municipalities to place cost-subsidized High Definition Crime Cameras, Gunshot Detectors and License Plate Recognition Cameras in needed areas.  Video is transmitted via the Internet to the Project NOLA National Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC) located at the University of New Orleans, where analyst provide valuable information to units responding to breaking crimes and dangerous situations.  Project NOLA may also transmit crime camera video and powerful AI driven automated alerts to local RTCC's and 911 Centers.

No local RTCC?  No problem!  Project NOLA will work to help your police and sheriff's department create their own monitoring room.
 
Time-Proven
 
 The most successful and cost effective crime camera program in America, Project NOLA has helped significantly decrease violent crime by dramatically increasing police efficiency and community support.   Since 2010, Project NOLA has helped investigate over 500 homicides, thousands of gun-related crimes, and countless property crimes involving thefts and burglaries.  In 2018, Project NOLA helped the NOPD reduce the murder rate in New Orleans to a 47 year low while also helping communities across America see huge double-digit reductions in non-fatal shootings and robberies. 

Specializing in gun, drugs and gang related crimes, Project NOLA may help a police or sheriff's department take as many as a dozen illegal firearms off the street in a single night by providing Real-Time notifications on known gang members illegally carrying firearms and providing the probable cause needed for officers to justify arrests and search warrants.

Low-Cost

​A 501c3 nonprofit organization, Project NOLA purchases brand new police-grade crime cameras using charitable donation and grant funds, then loans cameras directly to individuals, associations and municipalities to help local law enforcement make communities safer places to live, work and visit.  Crime camera hosts or sponsors only pay Project NOLA is what it cost us to receive, record and transmit camera video to local law enforcement, which costs as little as $300/ year per camera (plus any special optional add-ons such as License Plate Recognition, Facial Recognition, etc).

There is no additional cost for PC software or mobile apps, which camera hosts and local law enforcement use to view camera video.  Furthermore, there are no software licensing charges and software upgrades are free.

Each crime camera also carries a 5 year manufacturers warranty.

Get Started

Often developing & launching community-wide crime camera programs within weeks of being contacted, individual residents, business owners, civic leaders, law enforcement professionals and government officials may quickly get the ball rolling by simply calling us.  We can custom tailor our program to meet your community's needs, raise funds, and even help to improve an existing crime camera program while also dramatically lowering its annual operating costs!


Also:


Facial recognition technology use in search for New Orleans jail escapees under scrutiny

During the ongoing massive manhunt for 10 inmates who escaped from a New Orleans jail last week, authorities say the use of facial recognition cameras run by a private organization helped lead to the recapture of one of the fugitives -- even as the police department has come under scrutiny by critics from civil rights organizations to conservative politicians over its use of the technology.

Earlier this week, New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick told ABC News that facial recognition cameras maintained by Project N.O.L.A. had been used in the New Orleans manhunt despite the fact that she recently ordered a pause in the automated alerts her officers had been receiving from the group, which operates independently of the police department.

Kirkpatrick recently told The Washington Post she ordered the alerts to officers turned off until she is "sure that the use of the app meets all the requirements of the law and policies."

Citing the New Orleans Police Department's partnership with Project N.O.L.A., the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement it is believed to be the first known widespread effort by a major American law enforcement agency to use artificial intelligence technology to identify suspects in an assortment of crimes across the city.

In a statement, the ACLU said the use of live facial recognition raises constitutional and privacy issues and "is a radical and dangerous escalation of the power to surveil people as we go about our daily lives." Critics of the New Orleans Police Department's use of facial recognition cameras said that the average citizen should understand that they are not opting in or are being made aware that they are being scanned by the cameras.

"Facial recognition technology poses a direct threat to the fundamental rights of every individual and has no place in our cities," Alanah Odoms, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana, said in a statement about the city's partnership with Project N.O.L.A. "We call on the New Orleans Police Department and the City of New Orleans to halt this program indefinitely and terminate all use of live-feed facial recognition technology."

Some Republicans in Congress also opposed the unchecked use of the technology, most notably Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Andy Biggs of Arizona, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Steve Daines of Montana.

In a March 27, 2025 letter to Kash Patel, who was then acting director of the federal Bureau Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms Explosives, Biggs, the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance, and Davidson raised concerns over news reports indicating the ATF utilized facial recognition technology to identify gun owners. "The Subcommittee has concerns about ATF's use of facial recognition and Al programs and the effects that its use has upon American citizens' Second Amendment rights and rights to privacy," the lawmakers wrote in their letter, requesting documents on policies and training in the use of facial recognition technology.

Democrats, including Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California and Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon have also joined bipartisan efforts to curtail the use of such surveillance.

How authorities are using live facial recognition

The 10 inmates escaped from the Orleans Justice Center in New Orleans on May 16, officials said. Five of the fugitives have since been recaptured, leaving five others, including three charged with murder, still on the run as of Thursday afternoon.

Kirkpatrick told ABC News this week that one of the fugitives was caught and another narrowly got away after live facial recognition cameras operated by Project N.O.L.A. located them while scanning crowds in the French Quarter.

Bryan Lagarde, executive director of Project N.O.L.A., told ABC News that after being notified of the jailbreak on Friday, state police gave his group a list of the escapees.

"We put that into our facial recognition. It took approximately four minutes to do that and within, literally, less than a minute later we started tracking two of the escapees," Lagarde said.

He said the information about fugitive Kendall Myles and another escaped inmate, who he said is facing attempted second-degree murder charges, was sent to state police investigators who confirmed the two men were part of the jailbreak.

"Then they immediately went out to the French Quarter, which is where we were tracking them walking down Bourbon Street," Lagarde said.

Myles was arrested after police found him hiding under a car. The second escapee, however, managed to get away.

"I'm sure they knew there were cameras because they were walking around with their faces held down and things like that. All it takes is just a second for them to look up and then there's facial recognition," Lagarde said.

Citing the ongoing investigation, Lagarde declined to say if his cameras have located any of the other escapees.

Group operates 200 facial recognition cameras in New Orleans

Largarde said that his organization has been using live facial recognition cameras in New Orleans for the past two years.

In response to potential privacy concerns, Lagarde said, "As far as the facial recognition is concerned, it's scanning your face, my face, everyone's faces. If you're wanted and we know that you're wanted, you're going to be in trouble. If you are not wanted, its going to instantly disregard your face and just move on to the next person."

He said his group maintains about 5,000 cameras in New Orleans, including 200 that have facial recognition capabilities. He said the facial recognition cameras not only scan faces, but also clothing, vehicle and license plates.

"We work a very large number of the major crimes here in New Orleans: Homicides, shootings, stabbings, home invasions, rapes, robberies all the way down to the thefts and the burglaries," Lagarde said.

Project N.O.L.A. works with the New Orleans Police Department and the Louisiana State Police but does not have an official contract with either agency, officials said.

Before the manhunt, the New Orleans police had appeared to distance themselves from Project N.O.L.A..

The police department "does not own, rely on, manage, or condone the use by members of the department of any artificial intelligence systems associated with the vast network" of Project N.O.L.A.'s cameras, a spokesman for the police department agency said in a statement to The Washington Post.

Kirkpatrick, the New Orleans police superintendent, said her agency has operated surveillance cameras across the city, many in the entertainment districts, but none of them have facial recognition capabilities. According to the New Orleans Police & Justice Foundation, the city has about 3,600 police operated cameras across the city.

What local laws say

While the city has an ordinance on the use of facial recognition technology, Kirkpatrick said there are exceptions to the rules.

"Sometimes, people think that we have a total ban on the use of facial recognition and that is not quite accurate," Kirkpatrick said. "There are exceptions, and I think that this one would meet the exception of those ordinances."

According to the city ordinance, "Evidence obtained from facial recognition alone shall not be sufficient to establish probable cause for the purpose of effectuating an arrest by the NOPD or another law enforcement agency. The source of the image and the underlying reasons for the requested use of facial recognition systems as an investigative lead shall be documented in a police report."

The ordinance says "facial-recognition technology, shall not be used as a surveillance tool." But the ordinance also states that "nothing in this section shall prohibit NOPD from requesting the use of facial recognition technology in the investigation of the prior occurrence of the following significant crimes as defined in Louisiana Revised Statute," including murder, manslaughter, solicitation of murder, first-degree robbery, drive-by shootings and carjackings.

"They had my permission, that's for sure," Kirkpatrick said of the use of facial recognition technology in the manhunt.

Three of the five escaped inmates still being sought on Friday have been have been charged with murder or attempted murder, including one who was convicted in a double homicide, authorities.

A 'dragnet system?'

The Washington Post investigation published this week reported that New Orleans police were using Project N.O.L.A.'s network of facial recognition cameras to monitor the streets for wanted suspects over the past two years in ways that appeared "out of step" with the local ordinance.

In the interview with ABC about the manhunt, Kirkpatrick said that Project N.O.L.A. is a "useful partner" but stressed that it is not law enforcement and is not bound by the local ordinance, raising issues of accountability about Project N.O.L.A. and the data it collects on ordinary citizens who are being surveilled in this untargeted manner.

"I'm very supportive of any technology that we can use to bring violent people back in, and then we can deal with the issues later, but we actually operate within the boundaries of the law," she said. "As long as it's constitutional, ethical, we're going to stay within the boundaries. But this is a bigger topic and discussion, mainly for our politicians to decide what kind of laws they want."

Other police departments across the country have faced questions over their use of the technology.

The use of facial recognition software by U.S. businesses has also grown sharply in recent years, analysts and privacy advocates told ABC News.

The uses range from tech companies securing personal devices and retailers scanning for potential shoplifters to e-commerce giants tracking delivery drivers. Retailers are also using facial recognition scanning on shoppers to adjust pricing in stores.

Companies contend that the technology helps them achieve a safe and efficient operation, benefiting consumers and employees alike. Critics say the powerful tool encroaches on the privacy of everyday people, risking undue punishment or discrimination, the experts said.

Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Security and Surveillance Project, said facial recognition cameras are an "unproven, error-prone tool."

"This is the first documented case in the U.S. of police using untargeted facial recognition, which countries like China employ to track people across cities and surveil their Uyghur citizens," Laperruque said in a statement to ABC News regarding New Orleans' police use of the technology. "This kind of dragnet system belongs in a dystopian sci-fi movie, not in American cities. Average pedestrians shouldn't have to worry that untested AI technology will set off alarm bells and send police after them."

One of the key issues of facial recognition and AI is that studies have shown that it can be racially biased and is particularly error prone with people of color, older people and women.

"There's been error rates between 80 and 90%. That means nine out of every ten times that the system says, 'Hey, here's someone from our watch list,' it's actually a false alarm," Laperruque said of the use of these cameras as untargeted or real-time surveillance tools based on pilot programs run in the United Kingdom.

"Facial recognition could be used to catalog attendees at a protest or political rallies of any affiliation, individuals going to a church, people visiting a medical clinic, or an array of other sensitive activities," Laperruque told ABCNews.

He added, "Given these risks it’s no surprise that surveillance reform in general -- and placing guardrails on facial recognition in particular -- has support from across the political spectrum, including some of the most progressive and conservative members of Congress -- just last month at a Congressional hearing conservative members of Congress highlighted the dangers of facial recognition and other unchecked forms of surveillance."


Also:


Neighborhoods Watched

New Orleans has spent millions to expand its police surveillance powers in recent years, providing the city with an unprecedented ability to monitor public spaces and track individuals.

Similar mass surveillance systems have rapidly spread to cities across the US in the last two decades, for the most part without any formal oversight or local regulation.

As a result, the public is often left in the dark about what tools and techniques the police use to spy on them.

In partnership with the Fund for Investigative Journalism, The Lens has spent the past year obtaining and reviewing thousands of city documents to get a snapshot of New Orleans' current surveillance apparatus and the rapid, largely unchecked nature of its growth.

“What’s up with these cameras?”

That’s what Dee Dee Green remembers thinking the first time she saw one of New Orleans’ police surveillance cameras in 2018, flashing red and blue lights over a community garden she manages in the city’s Hollygrove neighborhood.

“There was no real community engagement around these cameras, it just happened,” said Green, a member of the local anti-surveillance coalition Eye on Surveillance. “We noticed a camera above our garden space and wanted to begin investigating.”

The cameras began popping up across town in late 2017 as part of a $40 million public safety plan that also included a fleet of license plate readers and a state-of-the-art surveillance hub called the Real Time Crime Center. Since then, local advocates like Green have been working to track and expose the city’s surveillance capabilities.

But it hasn’t been easy.

New Orleans’ surveillance apparatus isn’t so much a comprehensive system as it is a sprawling, decentralized and constantly changing patchwork of tools maintained by various city departments, semi-independent agencies, private nonprofits and federal and state law enforcement.

“It's sort of a Frankestein's monster,” said Bruce Hamilton, former senior staff attorney for the ACLU of Louisiana, who now works for the Southern Poverty Law Center. “I don’t think there's a grand plan.”

There is no consolidated “department of surveillance” in New Orleans, no single venue where residents like Green can go to learn more. Nor is there a formal regulatory structure for internal tracking, public disclosure or approval for surveillance or data collection technology.

The city makes it even harder to navigate that labyrinth by consistently refusing or failing to give accurate information to the public, privacy advocates told The Lens.

“The status quo is that the government is really free to acquire, deploy, expand existing surveillance technology outside of public view, without public input and without oversight,” said Chris Kaiser, the advocacy director for the ACLU of Louisiana and member of Eye on Surveillance, at a New Orleans City Council hearing last year.

“Often, as a result, we really don't know what's out there.”

Despite all the muddiness, the city drew one clear line in the sand early into the camera program: it wouldn’t use facial recognition.

For over two years, officials repeatedly assured the public of that voluntary restriction. It’s even written in bold on the city’s website and included in the privacy policy for the Real Time Crime Center.

It was a rare point of clarity in an otherwise opaque surveillance system. Except it wasn’t true.

In November 2020, the NOPD admitted that detectives had been using facial recognition since at least 2018. The department justified its previous denials by arguing that the city didn’t own the software itself. Instead, NOPD investigators were accessing it through the Louisiana State Analytics and Fusion Exchange — one of 82 “fusion centers” across all 50 states that make up a vast, federally funded intelligence and data sharing network.

“It's a distinction without a difference,” Hamilton said. “NOPD is still using the technology, just getting someone else to do the dirty work.”

And that wasn’t the first time the city was accused of shrouding its surveillance powers.

In 2018, an article from The Verge shocked many New Orleans residents when it revealed that the NOPD had quietly obtained an advanced analytic software — called Gotham — and used it to create a database listing the one percent of New Orleans residents with the highest perceived threat of committing a gun crime.

The software was made by Palantir — a data-mining company founded by billionaire Peter Thiel with early investment from the CIA’s venture capital branch. The NOPD had been using the software for six years by the time the practice was exposed by The Verge, which characterized it as a “predictive policing system.”

Starting in 2012, under former Mayor Mitch Landrieu, the city used Palantir’s Gotham software to identify and round up hundreds of potential gang-members for public safety “interventions” at the criminal court building, where they were informed that they and their friends were being closely watched and could face enhanced prosecution for future crimes.

"We know who you are. We know who your friends are. We know where you go. We know everything about you," Landrieu said after the first “intervention” in 2012.

Even getting basic information about the city’s surveillance arsenal can be an exhausting exercise. The city, for example, refused to release a map of its surveillance cameras for years until it was sued by an attorney from the Orleans Public Defenders Office with representation by the ACLU.

“The fact that we had to sue to get a map of publicly visible cameras I think just illustrates the kind of ridiculousness of the city claiming it has any type of transparency when it comes to surveillance,” Hamilton said.

The city ended up fighting the lawsuit all the way to the Louisiana Supreme Court before it was finally forced to turn over the camera locations in 2020.

“If transparency was anything more than just lip service, the city would have just said, ‘Here's the map,’ “ Hamilton said. “We shouldn't have had to fight for it.”

To Hamilton, the city’s record points to a clear conclusion: The public can’t trust City Hall to willingly and accurately inform them about the tools it uses to spy on them.

“They don't deserve our trust,” Hamilton said.

Over the past year, Cantrell’s office denied multiple interview requests for this project and ignored many of The Lens’ emailed questions regarding the city’s use, oversight of and investment in surveillance technology. The city also provided incomplete and inaccurate records in response to some of The Lens’ public records requests.

But a short written statement from a Cantrell spokesperson said that the Real Time Crime Center “is governed by a strict policy” and that “access is restricted and monitored.”

"The Crime Center has hosted many community groups for tours and has attended dozens of community meetings to provide information on the public safety camera program and to answer frequently asked questions. A map of camera locations is available on the website, along with a form for residents to submit camera location requests."

In a short statement, Landrieu told The Lens that his administration strived to balance public safety needs with privacy rights.

“You can have Constitutional policing and reduce crime,” Landrieu said. “It is possible to do both.” Falling barriers to mass surveillance

Local mass surveillance systems have spread rapidly across the U.S. in the last two decades, from major cities like New York, to smaller ones like Birmingham, Alabama, all the way to towns with populations under 1,000.

“Some of those traditional checks and balances as far as budgeting are being circumvented and police departments are building huge arsenals of surveillance technology without any kind of engagement from lawmakers and without the awareness of the public,” said Nathan Sheard, the Associate Director of Community Organizing for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital privacy nonprofit.

Sheard said that historically, electronic mass surveillance systems were kept in check more by simple practicality than legal restrictions. Some technologies widely used by law enforcement today were traditionally too pricey for local police department budgets, while others were only recently invented.

But with cheaper technology and increased funding from the federal government, the prevalence of local mass surveillance systems has exploded. And some officials are now convinced that new legal restrictions are necessary to replace the falling barriers of cost and technology.

“It became abundantly clear that this was one of those places where technology was moving at the speed of light, but electeds and the government were moving at a snail's pace in terms of creating policy around it,” Orleans Parish District Attorney Jason Williams told The Lens. “I do think we're behind. I think most American cities are behind on this.”

Williams, a former City Council member who ran for DA in 2020 as a progressive reformer, isn’t wholly opposed to new surveillance technology.

“There's a ton of technology I plan on using to prove cases over here at the DA's office,” he told The Lens. “If someone is using a weapon on city streets and it's picked up on a camera and I can access that camera, I'm going to use that as evidence.”

As a council member, he praised the city's 2017 surveillance expansion efforts, and specifically encouraged a controversial, and ultimately abandoned, plan to install infrared cameras that could see through people’s clothes to virtually check for weapons.

"Some of my liberal friends may say this is an infringement upon constitutional rights, but at the end of the day, what is more important than the safety of this community?” Williams said in 2017.

Williams was also an outspoken advocate of expanding data collection outside of the criminal justice system with “smart cities” technologies — an urban planning idea and multi-billion-dollar industry that encourages city governments to maximize data collection and analysis across all facets of civic life.

The more the city knows about its residents, the theory goes, the better it can serve them.

Analyzing traffic patterns can help reduce congestion. Monitoring residents’ energy usage can increase energy efficiency. Putting sensors in trash cans can help cut down on collection costs and prevent bin overflow. Other smart cities technologies have been credited with combatting the coronavirus pandemic, monitoring air quality and mitigating flooding risks.

But that “smart” technology can also mean an exponential rise in the amount of data cities collect about their residents, and sometimes come with privacy implications that aren’t apparent when they’re first installed.

“Smart recycling bins” in London were turned off after it came out that they were mining data from passing smartphones. And the City of San Diego turned off the cameras in its “smart street lights” — originally installed as a way to study traffic patterns — after the public discovered the police started using them for criminal investigations.

Williams still believes in the potential of those technologies, but said his outlook “evolved” during his years on the City Council as he saw “how pervasive this technology can be in every facet of our lives without us actually having an intelligent conversation about whether or not we want all of this to happen.”

“People want the latest and greatest thing, but we're not educating ourselves on the negative ramifications of some of this technology,” he said.

In 2020, after he announced his run for DA, Williams began working with Eye on Surveillance to create a law setting restrictions and oversight measures for surveillance, only some of which were ultimately approved by the City Council.

“We gotta get in front of it,” Williams said. “Even if it's not here yet, we need to start having conversations about the best way to use these things and what we don’t want them to do ever.”

‘Fundamentally different’

Police surveillance is nothing new. Local police have long monitored public spaces — standing on a street corner, staking out a house or following a suspect through public streets. And they have long used data on residents, like arrest records and fingerprints, to solve cases.

Rafael Goyeneche, a former prosecutor and president of the Metropolitan Crime Commission, argues that new surveillance technologies are simply enhanced versions of what police have always done. He compared using facial recognition software to broadcasting a suspect photo and asking for citizen tips, both of which come with the risk of misidentification and racial bias.

“The technology is only a tool,” he told The Lens. “It doesn't mean that anyone's rights are being violated. It doesn’t mean the police are engaging in anything covert or constitutionally invalid.”

But Dave Maass, the head of investigations for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, argued that the technology at the fingertips of local law enforcement today isn’t just augmenting existing practices, it’s changing the nature of government surveillance and public anonymity altogether.

“If you look 20, 30, 40 years ago, when we're talking about surveillance, we're talking about a dude sitting in his car with binoculars looking at a particular person for a particular investigation,” Maass said. “We look at where we are now, we're talking about the advent of technologies that are collecting data on everyone all the time, regardless of whether you're suspected of being involved in a crime.”

“These are fundamentally different things,” he said.

New Orleans has steadily grown its surveillance hardware year after year. By late 2018, the Real Time Crime Center had access to a little over 300 live camera feeds. By the end of 2019, it was up to roughly 600. And by early 2021, there were nearly 1,000.

Meanwhile, in August, the city announced it was using $1 million in federal coronavirus relief aid to buy 150 to 160 more license plate readers.

But while the hardware is the most visible element of New Orleans’ surveillance network, the real power is on the other side of the lens — the advanced analytic software that mines, organizes and analyzes the footage.

“What we have now are algorithms that are watching all of the cameras all of the time, indexing everything in those cameras and then storing that potentially indefinitely,” Maass said.

The city started using this kind of algorithm in 2017 with a software called BriefCam. Instead of requiring officers to watch every second of every camera feed to find what they’re looking for, BriefCam watched it for them and broke down the footage into searchable components.

“BriefCam’s breakthrough technology detects, tracks, extracts and identifies people and objects from video, including; men, women, children, clothing, bags, vehicles, animals, size, color, speed, path, direction, dwell time, and more,” said a BriefCam press release announcing its work in New Orleans.

Once everything is broken down and cataloged, officers could easily comb through hours of footage in just minutes. (The city said it stopped using BriefCam in late 2019.)

This type of software is also used with body camera footage. Body cameras were adopted by the NOPD in 2014 as a police accountability measure, but they’re also a major tool in prosecutions.

In 2016, the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office started using software to mine and catalog audio and video captured by body cameras. The company announced its business with the New Orleans DA in a 2016 press release.

“It makes video completely searchable. The software creates an audio transcript and record of faces and text in each video through an automated system, which means an officer or investigator can type in a person's name or keywords like drugs and search for when and where it was spoken in the video.”

The police also use advanced software, like the one from Palantir, to automatically analyze the massive troves of data at their disposal, including arrest records, jail phone call logs, parole and probation records, incident reports and interview cards. The NOPD’s field interview cards in particular raised privacy concerns soon after they were introduced in 2011, when The Times-Picayune reported that the police had used the cards to collect and store names and personal information of 70,000 people in just a year.

Brian Hofer, chair of the Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission, told The Lens that while many of the records held by the city and police may not seem very intrusive in a vacuum, they become exponentially more revealing as they’re connected.

“The individual privacy impact from a single data point, probably low, maybe even zero,” Hofer said.

But when you start connecting the dots, he said, even a relatively small amount of data can paint an intimate portrait of someone’s life. He referenced a 2013 peer-reviewed study in Scientific Reports that found that 95 percent of people could be identified with just four location data points.

“These data points are that revealing,” Hofer said. “We’re creatures of habit. We drive to work the same way, we drive to school the same way.”

Tracy Rosenberg, an activist with the anti-surveillance group Oakland Privacy, said that many surveillance products being marketed to cities — like Palantir’s Gotham software — focus on finding connections, trends and social networks in their own data that would otherwise be nearly invisible to a human investigator.

“The pitch of the surveillance vendors has been we're going to let you get more information, but more importantly we're going to let you integrate it, we're going to take it out of silos, we're going to make the information work together, we're going to put it in one place,” she said. “That is definitely surveillance nirvana.”

She said a major concern for her is how these surveillance products will allow law enforcement to take advantage of government databases that haven’t traditionally been a routine part of police investigations, especially as “smart cities” technologies ramp up municipal data collection.

“If you think about the volume of information that cities collect, which can include public health data, tickets and citations, educational records, voting records, the potential for what we call ‘data fusion’ is kind of extensive,” Rosenberg said. ‘The Wild West’

Oakland, California was one of the first cities in the U.S. to start regulating surveillance at the local level. Hofer said the city’s fight for reform began with a 2013 proposal for a federally funded surveillance network.

“The City of Oakland launched this proposal for a citywide mass surveillance program that would blanket the entire city,” Hofer said. “It was similar to what happened a couple years after that in New Orleans with the Real Time Crime Center.”

City officials hadn’t sought public input on the plan, according to Rosenberg. She said the public ended up finding out “through nothing more than an accident.”

“It really only came out because an employee with the City of Oakland found some paperwork and sent something out to activists saying you might be interested in this,” she said. “We had no guardrails in place, no policies. It was the Wild West.”

Basically, they were where New Orleans is today.

“You didn’t even know the technology was being used,” Hofer said. “What we were doing in Oakland is probably what you guys are doing, submitting a lot of public records requests and poring through agendas and contracts, matching up model numbers and serial numbers and trying to see what was being used. And that takes a lot of effort.”

Rosenberg said there are practical limits to what the public can access through what she referred to as “public records odysseys.”

“For everything we asked, we probably got answers on 20 to 30 percent of it. We still have public records requests that go back to 2014 and 2015 that haven't been answered.”

Oakland activists were able to get the city to back down from the 2013 plan. But that wasn’t the end of the anti-surveillance movement.

“We started thinking about, ‘OK, how do we keep this from happening again?’ ” Rosenberg said. “What is the proactive thing we can do so we don’t have to fight these things after they're sort of 75 percent or more there? … It became a challenge to mobilize citywide and start saying no, you can't move this forward essentially on the basis of inertia and entropy.”

In 2016, the ACLU launched its Community Control Over Police Surveillance, or CCOPS, campaign and created a template ordinance with three central requirements: City Council approval of existing and future surveillance technology, annual public reporting on how those technologies are used and a community advisory committee to make recommendations on surveillance policy.

“The biggest win of the framework, I think, is that it brings everything out into the open,” Hofer said.

Oakland passed its version of a CCOPS law in 2018, among the first cities in the country to do so. According to the ACLU, at least 21 cities, representing a combined 17 million residents, have passed some sort of CCOPS law since 2016 including Nashville, Tennessee; Madison, Wisconsin; New York City and Pittsburgh.

But that still leaves the vast majority of American cities — including New Orleans — without this type of regulation.

“Regulatory efforts are starting to catch up, but we were caught flat-footed,” Rosenberg said. “We're all making it up as we go along. The anti-surveillance movement as it is is maybe a decade old at best. So these are very new challenges we're facing.”

‘I have nothing to hide’

Hofer has worked with organizations across the country, including Eye on Surveillance, and said that every community is different in terms of the level of government monitoring it's willing to accept.

“I'm not an abolitionist. I do think some technology can be used appropriately,” he said. “You can determine yourself in each community where to draw the line. It's up to the residents in that city to determine what they think is appropriate and not appropriate.”

For some outspoken anti-surveillance advocates, the technology that cities like New Orleans are adopting act as an extension of what they see as deeply flawed, biased and overly punitive criminal justice and immigration systems.

“It's a way of controlling the masses, including immigrants,” Santos Alva, an organizer with the local immigrant advocacy organization Congress of Day Laborers, told The Lens through an interpreter. “They don’t mess with people who have a good economic standing in this society. They mess with Black people, they mess with brown people, they mess with immigrants.”

Of course, not everyone feels that way about the police.

“There are certainly people that bring up the argument ‘I have nothing to hide,’ ” New York-based privacy advocate Albert Fox Cahn told The Lens.

“Especially with police being as polarizing a topic as they are right now, there are many people who will reflexively talk about their desire to stand in solidarity with the police, a sort of ideological alignment. But even those individuals, when you talk about some of these cases that get to points of sensitivity in their own lives, it's a very different reaction.”

Polling from the Pew Research Center shows that when it comes to government surveillance, the majority of Americans are concerned, believe the risks outweigh the benefits and have little to no idea about what’s being done with the information collected from them or what privacy laws are on the books.

“We all have facets of our lives that make us feel vulnerable when they're tracked or exposed. And it’s different for different stakeholders,” Cahn said.

Some people, he said, might feel the greatest concern about police targeting people based on their religious affiliations. Others may be more skeptical of the government spying on political organizations or creating a database of gun owners.

The Pew poll indicated that for many Americans, there is greater concern around data collected by private companies than government surveillance.

But, Hofer said, “Those lines are becoming fuzzy.”

The government is a consumer in the booming market for personal data collected by private companies. Several federal agencies have purchased private smart phone location data. The Treasury Department has purchased employment data from a subsidiary of the credit bureau Equifax to help determine eligibility for food stamps and disability benefits.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has a contract with a Swedish company that collects data from cars — including navigation history and information from bluetooth connected devices. The popular home security Ring “video doorbells” share footage with thousands of police departments. In New Orleans, a program called Leads Online provides access to hundreds of millions of pawn shop purchase records.

Maass argued that the upsurge of mass government data collection isn’t only a privacy issue, it’s a security issue as well, especially when it comes to small, local agencies.

“Police departments don’t have tech-company-class cyber security professionals who are just locking down their system and doing security audits,” he said.

In 2015, Maass co-wrote a report about how three police departments just outside of New Orleans — St. Tammany Parish Sheriff’s Office, Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office, and the Kenner Police — left their license plate reader systems completely exposed.

“There were license plate readers where you could just go to a URL, on a website, and bring up the camera,” Maass said. “You could bring up the control, you could siphon off the data as it was coming in, you could watch the live footage. And nobody had actually done the actual investment to protect the software, no one had done the due diligence.”

Williams said he had similar concerns about the city entering surveillance contracts with private vendors, comparing the city to a product consumer who blindly agrees to a long terms and conditions document.

“The same way you can click a box without reading a 40-page document, that same thing is happening with municipalities across the country as it relates to technology,” he said.

Some advocates also have doubts about the city’s role as a steward of all this data. In December 2019, New Orleans was hit by a cyber attack that locked the city out of its own data and systems. It took millions of dollars and a full year to recover.

The city has said it upgraded its cybersecurity procedures during the recovery process. But even then, it’s difficult to know if the city will ever be fully protected when some of the country’s most sensitive and secretive government agencies have been compromised by cyber attacks in recent years.

‘Who was lying?'

Eye on Surveillance and other local advocates have proven it’s possible to push back on the city’s surveillance expansion. But their successes in halting surveillance initiatives come with an important caveat: the public needs to know they exist first.

Public pressure forced the City Council to drop a controversial ordinance in 2018 that would have forced every alcohol vendor in the city to install surveillance cameras directly connected to the Real Time Crime Center. The same year, when the NOPD’s use of the Palantir software caused a public backlash, the city announced it wouldn’t renew the contract. And soon after the NOPD admitted it was using facial recognition in 2020, the City Council banned the use of facial recognition.

But the public rarely gets any advanced warning of new surveillance initiatives. Expansions are often simply announced, rather than brought up for public debate. Other times the public is never informed at all.

“We can't regulate or prohibit technologies that we don’t know exist, that we don’t know our police department might be using,” Hofer said.

Part of the problem, advocates argue, is an intentional tactic from city officials to avoid public debate and controversy. But they said the issue goes beyond just secrecy from individual officials, and that there are institutional obstacles to transparency that arise from the city's near total lack of internal oversight.

Those obstacles can persist even when government officials attempt to be transparent. For example, during the two years the NOPD was using facial recognition, city leaders and elected officials repeatedly and falsely claimed the opposite. But not all of those officials knew they were lying.

“It's unclear to me personally who was lying and who didn't know what they should have known,” Hamilton said.

City Council members, for their part, had every reason to believe the technology wasn’t being used. At a July 2020 hearing, council members asked the city’s Chief Technology Officer and the administrator of the Real Time Crime Center whether the city was using facial recognition. And repeatedly, those officials assured them it was not.

“Of course the city doesn’t deploy any facial recognition technology in a law enforcement purpose,” RTCC administrator Ross Bourgeois told the council. “The city doesn’t have any of that technology available for our use.”

Just a few months later, when it was revealed that wasn't true, NOPD Superintendent Shaun Ferguson told the City Council that he was just as surprised as they were.

“I had no idea we even had access to this. So it's nothing we ever tried to hide at any point in time,” Ferguson said. “I have since learned that our department did not have a policy with regards to using this tool.”

That doesn’t bring much comfort to Marvin Arnold, an organizer with Eye on Surveillance.

“I don’t know which is better, if they lied about facial recognition or if the chief just didn't know,” Arnold said. “I've seen how little the public and even the city itself knows about these systems. I don’t think the majority of council members understand what city surveillance looks like. I don’t even think our city administrators understand it. So how can your average resident?”

Maass leads the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Atlas of Surveillance, an attempt to identify and map local and state surveillance usage. He said one of the major obstacles was dealing with officials who were unaware of the surveillance technology being used within their own government.

“That is a huge problem,” Maass said. “I'll file a public records request and the agency will come back and say, 'Well we don't use that technology.' And I actually have to show them the receipts, like, yes you do. Then they check back again and they're like, 'Oh yeah, I guess we didn’t know.’ This happens all the time, all over the country.”

Similarly, when the city’s use of the Palantir software was revealed six years after it began, there was a debate over how intentionally secretive the city had been.

When The Verge broke the news, the headline read, “Palantir has secretly been using New Orleans to test its predictive policing technology.”

A few days after that article, The Times-Picayune called the relationship “a not-so-secret secret,” pointing out that the software was disclosed on the city-run website for former-Mayor Landrieu’s NOLA for Life program as well as a public report from 2016.

“The reporting on the use of the Palantir technology was false and misleading,” Ryan Berni, one of Landrieu’s top deputies, said in a recent interview. “It should not have been a secret for anyone who was paying attention to the NOLA for Life program.”

Nonetheless, much of the public was unaware of the city’s relationship with Palantir, as were members of the City Council and the city’s Office of the Independent Police Monitor. And many residents wondered how the city could have avoided any sort of public vetting before entering the Palantir contract.

The answer is that there simply wasn’t any public process or disclosure requirement for the city to evade.

Most city contracts don’t require City Council approval or a public hearing. And the city doesn’t have to issue press releases every time it signs a contract. Many of those records are available to the public upon request. But until someone asks, the city has no legal obligation to announce its use of surveillance technology any more than it has to announce its use of Microsoft Word.

Even if you do get a hold of a city contract, they are often vague. In the Palantir contract, for example, the company’s responsibilities are simply listed as providing the city with “such technological data as necessary to deploy the Project.”

In fact, at the same time as the city was using the Palantir software, it was using another, very similar piece of software called Coplink by Forensic Logic. Coplink and Palantir’s software are often referred to as market rivals. Ronal Serpas, who was the Police Superintendent when the city first adopted Palantir, compared it to Coplink in a 2018 interview with Fox 8.

The Coplink software never received the widespread attention drawn by the Palantir contract, and the city continued using Coplink without controversy up until April 2021, when the contract expired, according to the NOPD.

Berni said the lack of City Council input on surveillance decisions is due to New Orleans’ “strong executive” model of government, in which the mayor decides the vast majority of day-to-day operational decisions.

“We have a system set up where there's a clear mandate where the executive and all the departments and agencies under it run the government,” he said. “The council is there to set the budget and big picture policy. And at various times, decides to get more in the weeds on specific issues. I think that's for the council to decide.”

‘It's not gonna stop’

The city of New Orleans grew its surveillance capabilities with little pushback from members of the City Council until, in early 2020, a seemingly innocuous proposal about streetlights came before the council’s Smart and Sustainable Cities Committee.

The proposal called for a pilot program to introduce 146 “smart street lights” equipped with video and audio recording. The cameras weren’t primarily for police use, city officials said, and would be mainly used to study traffic patterns. But the footage would be made available to the Real Time Crime Center.

At the same time, the city of San Diego was facing a public backlash over the same street lights. The city had installed over 3,000 of them in 2017. But many residents were disturbed after finding out in 2019 that the police had started using the camera footage for their investigations. The reaction was so strong that San Diego’s City Council is now poised to pass a comprehensive CCOPS ordinance, and has turned off the smart street light cameras until it does.

The smart street lights hit a nerve in New Orleans as well. Members of Eye on Surveillance were frustrated that they were once again caught off-guard by a surveillance proposal.

“I guarantee that instead of saying they were having a meeting about smart cities, they said they were having a meeting about adding 146 more cameras, a lot more people would attend,” Arnold told The Lens at the time. “Overall, the onus has been on the community to find out the specifics rather than them being forthcoming.”

In a somewhat surprising turn, then-Councilman Williams decided to put the smart cities pilot on hold until the council could pass comprehensive surveillance regulation similar to CCOPS legislation in other cities. He said that the decision was heavily influenced by the work of Eye on Surveillance advocates.

But not everyone on the City Council had the same appetite for regulation. Some didn’t want to take a “tool out of the toolbox” for police, or insisted that their constituents wanted more surveillance, not less. Others worried about the administrative burden of tracking all that technology.

The City Council ended up cutting almost all the forward-looking provisions from the ordinance, the ones meant to create an ongoing regulatory structure for surveillance. The only explanation given during the meeting was simply that the NOPD had asked them to remove those pieces of the law.

“We've stripped extensive approval and reporting processes as requested by the NOPD,” Williams said during a December council meeting.

The NOPD didn’t respond to questions about its alleged request to change the legislation.

What the council passed instead was a full ban on four types of technology: facial recognition, predictive policing, characteristic tracking software and cell-site simulators, also known as stingrays.

The ordinance was no small achievement. New Orleans is just one of a handful of cities in the country to outlaw facial recognition and predictive policing. It’s likely the first city to outlaw stingrays. And the law sets up a framework to create future guardrails.

But activists, both in New Orleans and nationally, say that individual bans, without any high level oversight or regulation, just aren't enough to keep the surveillance state in check.

“The problem there is you've intervened effectively on four kinds of surveillance technology, and everything else is left untouched,” Rosenberg said. “And for the moment, that probably has some efficacy. But as time moves on and technology marches on, there will be new things down the road that potentially are just as disturbing as those you chose to ban."

Advocates also point out that without those oversight measures, there’s no sure way to verify whether those bans are even being followed, considering that the city falsely claimed it wasn't using facial recognition for years.

And already, the NOPD is working to walk back at least the facial recognition ban. Councilman Jay Banks told The Lens that the NOPD was working on a policy on how it would use facial recognition and that he would support reversing the ban if the policy was sound.

Meanwhile, although the City Council abandoned the smart cities pilot program, the city is moving ahead with an even bigger version of the project. It recently selected a contractor to implement a broad smart cities program that would, according to the contractor’s proposal, include 3,000 smart street lights, each of which would have at least two cameras.

“It's not a one and done,” Hofer said. “It's not gonna stop and it's not gonna slow down.”