New World Order

In international relations theory, the term "new world order" refers to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. However, in conspiracy theory, the term "New World Order" (the capital letters are distinguishing) refers to the advent of a cryptocratic or authoritarian world government.

1. Alternative World Scenarios for a New Order of Nations [144 Pages] - The author of this futures work presents scenarios appropriate for near- to long-range planning of the activities of the Department of Defense and its agencies out to the year 2020 and beyond. Additionally, the scenarios, because of their design, are useful to other departments of the U.S. Government, industry, business, and academia. Forecasts developed for this report use a technique created by the author for monitoring past, present, and future global trends and events, which he molds into plausible and thought-provoking scenarios of the United States in the world's societies of tomorrow. These plausible scenarios are provided so that users can build policies and make decisions while anticipating and judging their consequences before implementation. Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Military environments, Alternative world scenarios, Active and reserve components, Long-range planning.
2. American Exceptionalism and a New World Order [23 Pages, 300 kb] - The United States has a long tradition of placing American values at the center of foreign policy. Establishing a new world order that is based on three cornerstones will begin to shape a new leadership role for the U.S. This involves a shift to soft power as the core competency of foreign policy. In addition, the U.S. needs to lead in developing key innovations and developing a global economic strategy. Also, the U.S. needs to maintain military might unequaled in the world. Achieving this new strategy rests upon international organizational change with the U.S. leading the way for a new world order.
3. An Analysis of the 'New World Order' and Its Implications for U. S. National Strategy [40 Pages, 1.91MB] - The Cold War is over and the result is a transition from a bipolar world of US vs. USSR to a multipolar world or New World Order where the US remains the only military superpower. However, this status is tentative for the United States. Like all the great superpowers in history, the US is about to let the weight of its military establishment, drag its economy into collapse. This paper looks at the implications of President Bush's new world order, and the opportunities it presents the US to preserve a peaceful international environment with an open international market system while at the same time retaining its superpower status. The paper establishes that the new world order is more than just rhetoric or simple statement of fact, it exists but is ill- defined. As a result, the paper proposes to define the term as a democratic world where all nations join together in partnership and cooperation under the framework of the United Nations to establish peace, prosperity, and justice for all.
4.  Arms Control and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: How Will They Impact U.S. Deterrence in the New World Order?, April 1996 [29 Pages, 1.1MB] - In the absence of a superpower balance, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) are rapidly proliferating. As U.S. defense resources shrink, options to address the new WMD threat are also shrinking. These dynamics are changing the role of Arms Control (AC) and U.S. deterrent strategy. This paper analyzes the relationship between proliferation of WMD, AC, and the status of U.S. deterrent forces in the new world order. It argues that motives to proliferate are to strong to be overcome by AC, but that AC can play a positive role in improving U. S. and International security. Further it argues that regardless of its efficacy that AC is unavoidable; and that U.S force structure decisions are driven by our perception of the threat, not AC agreements or actions.
5. Back to the Future: The Role of the Founding Fathers in Shaping the New World Order [145 Pages, 5.67MB] (Master's Thesis) - This thesis asserts that America bas a core set of values inherited from the Founding Fathers that should serve as an integrating mechanism for strategic planning. The author shows how American core values developed and were operationalized in the operational codes (paradigms) of the Founding Fathers, the policy makers of the Cold War era, and contemporary policy makers as they set out to define America's role in the New World Order. The paper begins with an investigation of the role that paradigms play in science and asserts that operational codes serve the same purpose for nations. This parallel is investigated because it provides an insight into the nature of paradigm shifts. The United States has had two identifiable paradigms -- isolationism and the goal of nation building of the Founding Fathers and the containment policy of the Cold War. From there, the nature of American values is investigated. Inheritance from Western civilization, the Enlightenment, the rise of Individualism, and the development of a unique American philosophy are all important elements in the nature of American values. The Declaration of Independence is shown to be an embodiment of these unique values. The best articulation of the operational code of the Founding Fathers is found in George Washington's Farewell Address. The statements on foreign policy and articulation of values which lead up to and follow the Farewell Address are examined. The thesis then moves from the era of the Founding Fathers to the era of the Cold War. The operational codes of George Kennan and Paul Nitze are compared and contrasted. Nitze's operational code as applied to Vietnam is examined through several presidential administrations, and lessons learned are offered. The author criticizes the National Security Strategy of August 1991 for its neglect of values. He contends that the Nation's new operational code must be based on core values inherited from the Founding Fathers.
6.  Beyond Stalemate: Deterrence and Nonproliferation in the New World Order, April 1994 [32 Pages, 1.7MB] - U.S. deterrence and nonproliferation policies need to be updated to meet the challenges of the new world order. To be effective, these new policies must be based on an understanding of potential proliferators motives for pursuing nuclear weapons, must be realistic, and must be implemented as early in the nuclear program as possible.
7. Building Order in The New World Order, 20 March 1992 [35 Pages, 1.2MB]  - ThiWith the end Or the Cold War and the shattering or the Soviet Empire to pieces smaller even than that ruled by Peter the Great a recurring theme or the defense debate is that the world is too uncertain, that invisible dangers lurk behind every bush, and that we must retain a huge military presence to protect against instability and potential threats. Our grand strategy, once easily articulated by the single word, containment, has been superseded and the lack of an unambiguous threat has prompted a fractious debate. Whether the size or our military forces are be based on what is necessary to protect our interests, or on what our politicians deem is affordable depends on our ability to look ahead to see a clear path tor our nation, and define the role the military will play.
8. Bush's New World Order: The Meaning Behind the Words [74 Pages, 0.4MB] - The phrase new world order has been widely used on the political scene since first publicly coined by former president, George Bush. Although quickly adopted as the catch phrase of the 1990s, few people actually agree on what new world order really means. Since new world order, while elusive in definition, is most frequently used to describe aspects of the post Cold War international scenario, understanding the true meaning of that phrase is critical to projecting our future strategic environment and prospects for the new millennium. The attempt of this paper is to reveal that true meaning. Historical analysis will be the primary methodology used to reveal the meaning of George Bush's specific terminology describing his concept of new world order. In a January 16, 1991 speech, he identified the opportunity to build a new world order where the rule of law governs the conduct of nations, and in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders. These words will be dissected and historically analyzed to develop a clear picture of new world order. Additionally, the primary mechanisms for implementing new world order will be addressed; and finally, specific strategic environment and national security implications will be drawn from those conclusions.
9.  Changing the Acquisition Process for a New World Order, April 1993 [46 Pages, 1.8MB] - The Chinese blessing (or curse?), 'May you live in interesting times', is certainly applicable in today's world. The crumbling of the Berlin wall and subsequent end of the Cold War prompted former President Bush to proclaim a 'new world order' had arrived. Unfortunately, the new world order is more a world of disorder. This paper explores the ramifications of these profound changes to the Department of Defense's acquisition process. The changes are a result of the shift in national military strategy from reliance on forces- in-being to a reliance on military potential. The following changes are discussed in the paper: (1) A More Flexible Acquisition Process; (2) Fewer New Starts/More Existing Program Upgrades; (3) Decrease in the Number of Production Programs; (4) Increased Focus on the Ability to Reconstitute; (5) Increased Emphasis on Four ' ... ilities'; and (6) Increased Reliance on Prototyping. Because of its importance, the subject of prototyping is examined in detail. But a prototype in and of itself does not represent a warfighting capability. A strategy must be devised to take a system that has been developed through low rate production and then 'shelved', through production restart. The following recommendations are then discussed: (1) Design Producibility In From the Start; (2) Increase Manufacturing Technology and Process Investment; (3) Develop 'Smart' Shutdown Technologies; (4) Develop a Long Lead Procurement Strategy; (5) Increase Reliance on Government/Commercial Integration; and (6) Increase Use of Lean Production Techniques. If the United States is to remain the leader of the 'new world order', the DOD acquisition process must change to adjust to the 'interesting times' in which we live.
10.  China's Response to the 'New World Order' [35 Pages, 1.3MB] - As world change swept the globe over the very recent past, U.S. President George Bush described an emerging 'new world order.' He stated a belief that the American system should form the basis of a new international system. He further stated that the U.S. must seek to take the lead in the new order forming such an international system. China is the largest of the very few remaining Marxist-Leninist states. As the third leg of the former world strategic triangle, China remained a challenge to U.S. foreign policy throughout the Cold War. Now that the Cold War is over, China is integral to the formulation of any new order. China's long history and cultural background differ significantly from America's. It is important that the U.S. understand, to the extent possible, how those differences will be reflected in China's response to the new world order. A review of Sino-American relations since normalization in the early 1970's shows reform that brought China increasingly closer to the U.S. until the Tiananmen Square tradegy in June, 1989. Since then, world events such as the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe, the Unification of Germany, U.S. dominance in Operation Desert Storm and the Soviet Coup have had great effect on China's leaders and the course of reform.
11. Deterrence for World Peace: A New World Order Option [41 Pages, 1.3MB] - The recent collapse of the former Soviet Union has brought an end to the Cold War and a beginning to change and uncertainty. The shift from a bi- polar to a multi-polar world has uncovered trends that make the future of the new world order complex and dangerous. The rise in regional conflicts, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, accelerated worldwide technology transfer, and the disposition of some 30,000 nuclear warheads in the Commonwealth of Independent States are but a few of the major trends that can have a profound effect on world peace if not controlled. To solve this problem of control will bring a new emphasis to the word 'deterrence.' For 45 years the word 'deterrence' has been most commonly used to describe the justification for a nuclear arms race between the United States and the former Soviet Union. Now, the global community of nations can 'deter' further proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by using the recommended three-part solution of a global nuclear test ban, worldwide acceptance of the Global Protection Against Limited Strikes (GPALS) system, and arms control enforcement using embargoes and economic sanctions by an international system like the United Nations.
12. Disorder in the New World Order [53 Pages, 2.34MB] - The phrase 'New World Order' has, over the last four years, become a much overused and relatively meaningless cliche. Its original intent was to provide a conceptual illustration of a tortured world community scintillatingly close to creating a new international order in the aftermath of the Cold War. This new international order would make possible a world without conflict, pain or hunger, where people of all regions could live in freedom as equals. This concept, and its attendant utopian condition, brings tears of hope from that portion of humanity which has the time to spend thinking on such things. However, in reality, thus far in our international devolution from 40 years of Cold War, we have made little, if any, progress toward realizing a New World Order. In fact, not only have we yet to decide upon what course we should take in pursuit of this new order, we have not even decided that this new order should be. In the interim, conflict, tension and war continue to expand around the globe while the major powers of the world, those with the potential to control global events for the betterment of the world community, continue in their intellectual struggle to determine a role for themselves.
13.  Explaining the New World Order of the 1990's, 2003 [32 Pages, 1 MB] - The decade of the 1990s dramatically altered the Cold War international order in two fundamental aspects. In the political-economic sphere, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 shattered the ideological divide that had driven much of the policy-making during the Cold War. The new Russia and its former eastern European client states rushed to adopt Western economic and political models, albeit with varying degrees of success. The handful of avowedly Marxist states, such as Fidel Castro's Cuba and Kim Il Sung's Democratic People's Republic of Korea, remained mired in despotism and economic ruin. The People's Republic of China gradually became Communist in name only as it sought to adopt market capitalism and limited democratic reforms to modernize its moribund economy. The two books I review in this paper attempt to explain why these tectonic changes occurred in the international order during the 1990s and what implications these changes herald for the future. In Empire, authors Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri propose a new emerging system of international order based on an ultimately successful Marxist theory. In Culture and Carnage: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power, Victor Davis Hanson proposes that the West's hegemony is derived from its cultural vibrancy which produced political, economic and military institutions far superior to anything in the non-Western world. Hardt and Negri have the much harder task. Despite their enormous efforts, they ultimately fail to validate Marxist theory as a viable predictor of the evolving world order. In contrast, Hanson has an easier job explaining why the West has won. His work convincingly shows that the West's military proficiency is directly attributed to its unique culture.
14.  Grand Strategies for Dealing with Other States in the New, New World Order [14 Pages, 110kb] - The art of statecraft has often involved efforts to improve the security of one state by taking advantage of the power and influence of other states. This is, for example, why a state typically seeks to forge military alliances with others. It is also why some states provide economic and military support to client or dependent states and why some advocate the formation of multistate trading blocs. The theory behind the trading-bloc strategy is that cooperation on security matters is more likely when there are strong economic and other mutually beneficial connections among the members of the bloc. Among the tools that have been and are being used to influence other states are trade preferences, loans, loan guarantees, concessionary pricing for military sales, export-import financing, technical assistance, foreign aid, and international disaster relief. While humanitarian altruism is a major factor in foreign aid and disaster relief, statesmen often see the reduction of suffering as a method of improving the stability of a recipient state or as an inducement for a recipient state to cooperate more fully on security matters. Many ideas for making American foreign policy more effective have been offered in recent years. Some of them involve ways of prioritizing all forms of official, state-to-state assistance on those states whose stability or cooperation will most benefit the national interests of the United States. Obviously, there are many states that are already stable and already do generally cooperate with the United States. Canada, Japan, and the states of Western Europe (disagreements over the second war with Iraq notwithstanding) fall into this category. Certainly the economically advanced and politically stable states of the collective West have a common interest in suppressing the signal threat- global terrorism- of the new, new world order that sprang from the rubble of the World Trade Center and Pentagon on 11 September 2001.
15.  Gunboat Diplomacy in a New World Order: Strategic Considerations for U.S. Naval Intervention in the Twenty-First Century [94 Pages, 4.64MB] - With the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact, the threat of global war has all but been eliminated. At the same time, the Third World is experiencing a rising tide of instability, brought about by economic and social inequities, religious fundamentalism, and resurgent ethnic and political rivalries, and fueled by increasing military capabilities caused by the proliferation of advanced-technology weapons. As a result of these changes, U.S. security strategy is turning from its Cold War focus on global containment to the protection of U.S. interests against regional instabilities. The most dramatic confirmation of this change in direction was the announcement by the President on 2 August 1990 of a new National Security Strategy which would focus on maintaining stability and responding to regional crises, rather than on preparing for a global conflict against the Soviet Union. The past decade offers numerous examples of U.S. intervention in regional instabilities and crises that achieved varying degrees of success. Many of these interventions provide important lessons for the future in terms of how and when to use naval forces, and what the risks are to the national interest if a given mission fails to achieve its military or political objectives. This study is an examination of U.S. naval strategy and its evolving focus on crisis intervention, and how recent uses of U.S. naval force illustrate the need for a reevaluation of naval intervention and its implementation in a "new world order." To this end, three specific uses of U.S. naval power in the last decade are instructive: the U.S. intervention in Lebanon from March 1982-March 1984; U.S. naval operations off Libya from August 1981-April 1986 (including the 1986 air strike on Tripoli); and the Persian Gulf tanker escort operation of 1987-1988).
16.  The Mexican Military Approaches the 21st Century: Coping with a New World Order [35 Pages] - The author's discussion of the roles and missions of the Mexican forces has special salience in this era of 'alternative missions.' Since the U. S. Army has had to deal with the same missions of civic action and counternarcotics, this study provides a timely and instructive lesson on how the Mexican military has wrestled with these challenges. North American Free Trade Agreement(NAFTA), Civic action, Counternarcotics, Mexico, Mexican army
17.  Military Diplomacy in the New World Order, 25 April 1993 [58 Pages, 2.69 MB] - The New World Order--that articulated by former President Bush at the end of the Cold War era--remains yet unsettled and, in fact, undefined. It is filled with uncertainties and instabilities caused by traditional enmities now reemerging. This reemergence is a result of a world shift from bipolarism to polyarchism. The leadership role of the United States in this new era will, it is predicted, involve selective engagement. Additionally, the U.S. will exercise the role of a grand facilitator. In this altered security environment, this paper argues that coercive and cooperative military influence--especially that defined as military diplomacy--has a continuing place in the exercise of U.S. global leadership. This study reviews the historical record of military diplomacy and examines the past use of the four services individually and in joint operations. Particular analysis is given to the current adaptive planning construct established by the Joint Staff with regard to the employment of flexible deterrent options as an aspect of military diplomacy.
18.  Military Operations Other Than War in the New World Order: An Analysis of Joint Doctrine for the Coming Era [71 Pages, 2.5 MB] - The United States has experienced numerous eras of distinct international systems which governed its relationship with other nations. The end of the Cold War symbolized a transition point between such systems. Historically, the nature of a new order as well as the transitional point between orders is fraught with uncertainty. Nonetheless, instruments of national power such as the military must respond to the changing system to remain effective. The post-Cold War era has been characterized by an increased use of the military for operations short of war to include humanitarian operations, peacekeeping, sanction enforcement, etc. Although these missions are not new to the Armed Forces, military doctrine has only begun to address the unique challenges involved in executing operations short of war. Joint Publication 3-07, Joint Doctrine for Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW), lists six fundamental principles for MOOTW. This research applies the concepts embodied in the principles of MOOTW with three MOOTW models; the Range of Military Operations Model developed by the U.S. Army, the Crises and Lesser Conflicts Model developed by Rand researchers Carl H. Builder and Theodore W. Karasik, and the MOOTW Characteristics Model developed by RAND researchers Jennifer M. Taw and John E. Peters.
19.  Military Review, September 1994. Volume 74, Number 9 [92 Pages]
20. National Missile Defense Strategy for the United States Post 11 September, 2001 - A Search for Security in a New World Order, 9 April 2002 [39 Pages, 2.1MB] - This paper examines the history of the ABM Treaty as it relates to missile defense and postulates strategic options as they relate to the U.S. strategic linkage to the treaty itself. This review includes 2nd and 3rd order effects for the U.S., as well as an assessment of strategic risk. Key nations included in this analysis include the U.S., Russia and China. In light of the current geo-political situation, the paper concludes with a recommended course of action and challenges for the future.
21.  The New World Order: A Second Look. A Selected Bibliography. [43 Pages] - Partial contents of this report pertain to: U.S. National Security; the U.S. Military; U.S. Foreign Relations; International Security; North Atlantic Treaty Organization; International Relations; World Economic Order; and Specific Countries and Regions.
22.  The New World Order: A Vision and Its Dimensions [46 Pages, 2.06MB] - The Cold War is over. The Soviet Union has been dissolved. The United States is no longer the world's preeminent economic power. Both Europe and Japan are enjoying a greater share of the world's resources. Still, from the perspective of combined military, economic, political, and diplomatic power, the United States has no equal. President Bush suggests that a 'New World Order' has emerged. Principles of democracy, shared responsibility and mutual cooperation among nations are the hallmarks of that new order. He recommends that the principles of the New World Order guide the foreign policy of the United States throughout the decade of the nineties and into the twenty-first century. This paper probes the dimensions of that New World Order. It discusses the likelihood of a unipolar or multipolar world, and concludes that a stratified world order might be a more apt description. It explores the role of international organizations within the new order. It examines implications for U.S. foreign policy, the Department of Defense, and the U.S. Army. The paper concludes by revealing why President Bush's vision is compelling.
23.  Nuclear Strategy in the New World Order [19 Pages, 0.4MB] - For 50 years, the US depended on its nuclear arsenal to provide the underpinning to the deterrent aspect of its military strategy. However, on September 11, 2001, three of four hijacked civilian aircraft successfully completed their suicide missions against high value targets in the United States-the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. US military might, to include its overwhelming nuclear arsenal, failed to deter the terrorists who killed nearly 3000 people, most of whom were Americans. Although the US nuclear force structure, policy and strategy have thus far deterred a nuclear attack on the US, it is not properly postured as a viable deterrent against asymmetric attacks. However, given the proper force structure, policy and strategy, the US nuclear arsenal could provide a greater degree of deterrence against such attacks in the future. This paper will first briefly describe the strategy of deterrence and its underpinnings in basic psychology. Second, it will briefly overview the deterrence strategy of the Cold War and highlight the findings of the Nuclear Posture Review that will serve as the foundation of the Bush nuclear strategy. Next, this paper will consider the ethical issues surrounding the use of nuclear weapons, as both a deterrent and a combat weapon. Finally, the paper will analyze US nuclear strategy and make policy recommendations for using nuclear weapons as part of a deterrent strategy against future asymmetric attacks.
24.  Peace in the Middle East: How It Will Impact the New World Order and the American Strategy [52 Pages, 1.91MB] - The historical events of the last decade have shifted the world system from the traditional West-East competition to cooperation and exchange of interests between the East and the West. Security and stability of the world has emerged as a very important element of the new world order. Since anything happening in any part of the world affects and gets affected by what happens in the other parts of the world, achieving peace and stability in the Middle East is important for the peace and stability of the world. Since the US is considered the leader of the new world system, the protection of international security and stability has become its responsibility. This paper begins with a description of threats and challenges to the peace of the Middle East, then discusses the bases of peace in the region, the impact of the regional peace on the new world order and the American strategy and ends with recommendations for achieving and keeping peace in the region.
25.  Policing the New World Order: An Alternative Strategy. [32 Pages] - The United States responded decisively in the recent Persian Gulf crisis. The Bush Administration considered successful resolution of this crisis a precursor to the "new world order." Many questions now confront policy makers as America approaches the 21st Century. A pressing question is the following: Can America continue to serve as the world's policeman? America's challenge for the 1990s is to avoid the trappings of world policing that past superpowers have experienced throughout history "a la Pax Britannica." The United States can achieve this by, first, formulating its national security strategy to elevate the role of the United Nations as the world's policeman. Second, the United States' national security strategy should support the establishment of a United Nations standing peacemaking force. This force would provide the United Nations and international community a short-notice military employment capability during the early "warning period" of an impending crisis. Such a force would ultimately lower the United States' profile as the world's policeman in the emerging new world order. This essay addresses in five parts the establishment of a standing United Nations peacemaking force. First, it analyzes the circumstances and the international implications of America's involvement in the Persian Gulf War. Second, it discusses the resultant new world order and the United Nation's inability to enforce world order. Third, it highlights a deficiency in America's emerging defense strategy for the new world order. Fourth, it presents a proposal for a standing United Nations peacemaking force that the United States would support in the 1990s. And finally, it concludes with a view of America's future in policing the new world order.
26.  Security Challenges for Small States in the New World Order: Options for Nepal [44 Pages, 1.9MB] - The post cold war period is marked by a new multi-dimensional strategic environment giving new focus to international relations and security of small states. Though the US is the only superpower, the world is moving to multipolarity and interdependence where regional powers and international systems have an increasingly powerful role. In such an environment small states are finding themselves even more vulnerable. This paper analyzes the security challenges small states face in the evolving new world order and suggests viable security options for small states in general and Nepal in particular. It analyzes the special characteristics of small states and their vulnerability to both traditional and new forms of threats. It relates national interests with world order and makes an in depth study of the security systems of balance of power and collective security from the perspective of a small state. It analyzes Nepal's regional and internal security environment as well as her historical setting and national interests. The paper then applies the concepts of security systems in the context of Nepal to determine viable security options.
27.  Strategy and Logistics for the New World Order [138 Pages, 5.79MB] -An interdisciplinary analysis of the post-Cold War world to determine the optimal strategy to attain the national interests of the United States, and the requisite logistic structure to support that strategy. The optimal solution is found to be a strategy based on multinational defense centered on a permanent force of United Nations garrison port complexes. This multilateral force would be augmented by as small a national defense force as necessary to ensure national security. The thesis endeavors to reconnect the cultural and philosophical past of the United States with its immediate future. National interests are identified through examination of American Pragmatism and the philosophies of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. To determine the current status of common defense, based upon the Foreign Military Sales system, and analysis of current data is accomplished. Future threats to the United States are examined with special emphasis on nuclear terrorism. The ability of Islamic nations in North Africa and the Middle East to produce significant quantities of uranium is demonstrated. The grave political as well as ongoing environmental consequences of this recent capability are discussed in detail.
28.  Technology Security Policy: From the Cold War to the New World Order [122 Pages, 5.42MB] -This thesis examines U.S. technology security policy in a transitional period marked by a rapidly changing security environment and an era of economic globalization. It provides an historical analysis of this policy since the onset of the Cold War and a financial analysis of the $40 million budget request for technology security, counter-proliferation, and export controls in the Clinton Administration's FY 1994 defense budget presentation. The historical analysis is based largely on the evolution and roles of two multilateral control regimes -- CoCom and the MTCR. The crux of this analysis is a detailed examination of the fate of the $40 million request as it moved through the congressional budget process. This analysis identifies problems and policy issues surrounding resource allocation for technology security. Based on the treatment of the budget request by the defense committees of Congress, a number of conclusions were drawn. Although technology security is considered a high priority item by both the executive and legislative branches of government, Congress appropriated funding for only 20 percent of the Administration's request. Significant decreases are attributed to inter-agency turf struggles, the slowness with which DoD policy-making positions were filled, and an initial spending plan that was perhaps overly ambitious and prematurely presented. Ultimately, two reviewing bodies were born out of legislative compromise; however, potentially redundant reporting likelihood of a decisive review of current proliferation policy.
29.  Toward A Dangerous World: U.S. National Security Strategy for the Coming Turbulence [336 Pages]
30.  Training Tactical Level Leaders in the United States Marine Corps: Meeting the Challenges of the New World Order [58 Pages]
31. Turkey's Role in the New World Order, Feb 1998 [7 Pages, 0.6 MB] - Turkey faces new challenges as the result of the political, military and economic developments we have been witnessing over the past decade, not the least of which is finding Turkey's role in the new world order that is now taking shape. If we were to make a brief evaluation of the present environment it would be correct to characterize it as a period of transition and transformation that calls for reorientations and new architectures.
32. The U.S. - Japan Security Alliance: Will it Survive in the New World Order? 1 April 1991 [126 Pages, 5.3 MB] - When George Bush took office in January 1989, he spoke of a new world order. The characteristics of this new world order may be more physical than the ideological Cold War. Some characteristics are emerging--resurfacing of old rivalries, greater interdependence between major powers, more weapons of mass destruction, information revolution, and the ascendancy of mass destruction, information revolution, and the ascendancy of economic power over military power to name a few. These changes mandate a review of old alliances designed to implement a national security strategy of containment. One candidate is the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan commonly referred to as the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance. Now that the Cold War is over, is this treaty still relevant? Given Japan's economic miracle, should the United States continue to provide Japan's national security and protect Japan's vital interests? This paper examines the treaty from three perspectives: Is the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance still relevant in the emerging world order from a military perspective? Is the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance still relevant from a political perspective? What roles should the United States and Japan undertake to promote stability in the emerging world order?
33. U.S. Strategic Maneuver: A New World Order Requires Some New Thinking, Not Reorganization, 21 June 1991 [39 Pages, 1.1 MB] - The current changes in the kinds of world threats we face and the requirement to downsize U.S. forces pose as significant challenge to the military as significant as those confronted at the end of World War II. The concept of Strategic Maneuver within the military, accompanied by a focusing process of (areas-to-threats-to-interests-to-resources-to-requirements) using the current organization, will allow a smaller force to operate effectively. The Persian Gulf War proved that the concept of Strategic Maneuver, formed by prioritizing and combining the individual and unique capabilities of each military services, is the best method to meet the future defense needs. The alternative plan of service reorganization and downsizing within compels the planners to unlearn all of the post-Viet Nam lessons. New mobility concepts such as the C-17's, for more efficient air lifting, and SL-7's for faster shipping cannot by themselves form the mindset needed to maintain efficiency. This paper argues that the wheel does mot have to be reinvented in order for a smaller one work as well.
34.  The United Nations Security Council Veto in the New World Order [183 Pages, 6.01 MB] - The United States should move to replace the Security Council veto with a double majority voting method. United States' national security will improve as international security improves. International security will improve as the Security Council acts effectively. The Security Council will act more effectively as it becomes more authoritative. Promoting respect for the Council and a veto alternative are necessary to make the Council more authoritative. The double majority voting method best promotes Council authority.
35.  A World 2010: A New Order of Nations [127 Pages, 5.69 MB] - In this book, A World 2010: A New Order of Nations, the author describes the decline of the influence of the 20th century superpowers. He explores the notion of a devolution of political and economic world power and forecasts a rise of a new order of nations. Further he advances the concept of a rise of 21st century postindustrial states to preeminence. These new realities could usher in a new era of relative world peace brought about by the crumbling of the Soviet Union, the formation of new global economic interrelationships and coalitions, and the advancement of former Third World nations to become competitive industrial states. The author concludes by forecasting the notion of a U.S. national requirement for a subdued worldwide military presence that serves a passive role, deterring conflict and preserving peace.

$112B Plan To Rebuild Gaza Called "Project Sunrise"

AI Overview

"Project Sunrise" is a $112 billion, 10-year proposal led by Jared Kushner and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff to reconstruct the Gaza Strip into a high-tech, luxury coastal hub, according to reports in late December 2025 and January 2026. Unveiled during the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2026, the plan aims to turn the war-torn territory into a "Middle East Riviera" with high-rise hotels, smart cities, and AI-optimized energy networks.

Key Aspects of Project Sunrise:

Vision: The 32-page blueprint proposes "pie-slice-shaped" smart cities, a new seaport, an airport, and a freight rail line.

Development Plan: The plan, which is slated to take 10 years, focuses on turning 70% of the coastline into commercial and tourist space. It is structured in phases, starting with "New Rafah" in the south to house 100,000 units before moving north.

Funding: The proposal includes a $112.1 billion investment strategy, with the U.S. potentially anchoring approximately $60 billion in grants and loan guarantees.

Conditions: The plan is heavily contingent on the total demilitarization of Hamas, with Kushner emphasizing there is "no Plan B" without verified disarmament.

Challenges and Criticism:

Security & Feasibility: Critics and officials doubt the feasibility of the project while Hamas is still active or without a stable political solution.

Humanitarian Concerns: The proposal faces backlash for focusing on luxury development rather than immediate, sustainable housing for the 2 million displaced residents, with some critics calling it a form of "colonization".

Rubble Removal: The plan faces a massive hurdle in simply clearing the estimated 60 million tons of debris, which the UN estimates could take over seven years.

Kushner has argued that with proper security, the project could transform the region rapidly, citing similar developments in other parts of the world.


Also:


Trump admin. pitches 'Project Sunrise' to turn Gaza into 'futuristic coastal destination'

The plan to transform the Gaza Strip into a "gleaming metropolis" was shown in 32 PowerPoint slides in a pitch to world governments and investors, the report said.

The Trump administration is pitching “Project Sunrise,” a plan that will reportedly rebuild the Gaza Strip into a “futuristic coastal destination,” according to a Friday report by the Wall Street Journal.

It noted that US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, along with US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and two other White House aides, drafted a proposal comprising 32 PowerPoint slides to transform Gaza.

The presentation, depicted as “sensitive but unclassified,” was shown to Turkey, Egypt, and several investors and wealthy Gulf kingdoms, according to the report.

This reconstruction would cost $112.1 billion over 10 years, according to the WSJ, which cited the draft proposal. The US would provide $60b. in grants, with the plan stating that Gaza would eventually be able to self-fund many projects.

The WSJ also notes that the presentation doesn’t specify which countries or companies would fund the reconstruction, nor where Gaza’s residents would live during the rebuilding. This has caused some US officials to express doubt about the plan, with some saying that Hamas will refuse to disarm in the first place.

The proposal was developed over 45 days, with Kushner and Witkoff enlisting the help of senior White House aide Josh Gruenbaum.

Officials cited by the WSJ said that if the project goes through, they plan to “update and revise the numbers about every two years as it unfolds.”

Kushner and Witkoff had previously met with Egyptian, Turkish, and Qatari officials in Miami to discuss developments in Gaza before the two US officials delivered their presentation.

Initial US announcement of Gaza takeover was made by Trump in February

The report by the WSJ comes almost a year after Trump initially announced during a joint press conference with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the US would take over the management of the Gaza Strip for the foreseeable future.

He said that by taking over Gaza, the US will create economic development that will provide an “unlimited number of jobs and housing for the people of the area.”

“We’re going to develop it, create thousands and thousands of jobs, and it will be something that the entire Middle East could be very proud of,” Trump said.

Friday’s WSJ report cited supporters of Kushner’s and Witkoff’s latest proposal, who said that allowing Gaza to continue without reconstruction or development is a worse alternative. It also cited Trump’s vision of turning Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East” as a better solution.


Also:


Kushner, Witkoff draft $112B proposal to develop Gaza into ‘smart city’ with luxury resorts

Trump administration reps have just revealed a grandiose $112 billion plan to rebuild war-torn Gaza into a futuristic international destination dubbed “Project Sunrise.”

The 10-year development plan, drafted by first son-in-law Jared Kushner, US special envoy Steve Witkoff, and two top White House aides, is currently courting investor countries with a 32-slide PowerPoint presentation detailing the bold plan to renovate burning rubble into beach resorts.

Illustration of the "Humanitarian Islands in Gaza" Plan: Interim Phase, showing various IDP cities, crossings, security inspections, and humanitarian aid routes within the Gaza Strip.

Gaza would see the development of luxury hotels, high speed rail and AI-optimized smart grid features that would revolutionize the small slice of the coveted Mediterranean coastline into a bustling metropolis, the Wall Street Journal reported.

“Gaza’s destruction has been profound, but we believe what lies ahead is not just restoration — it’s a chance to develop a gateway of prosperity in the Middle East with state-of-the-art infrastructure, urban design, and technology,” the executive summary slide read, according to the outlet.

The total $112 billion cost would be spread out over 10 years, with the US agreeing to “anchor” up to $60 billion in grants and guarantees on debts by raising industry funds.

“Reimagining Gaza as a ‘smart city’ with tech-driven governance and services,” one slide from the PowerPoint presentation beamed.

The ambitious proposal — developed within the last 45 days by Kushner, Witkoff, and White House aides consulted Israeli security experts about the path forward — further called for establishing a “Chief Digital Office and an innovation lab to define standards and guide policymaking.”

The presentation does not go into detail about which countries or companies would be investing in the rebuilding fund, according to WSJ.

Though the plan mapped out distinct phases of construction, it did not provide details for housing the 2 million Palestinians who would be displaced during the massive construction necessary.

There is an estimated 68 million tons of rubble in Gaza after thousands of Israeli airstrikes leveled cities during the two-year war in Gaza.

US officials who have knowledge of the proposal are skeptical that it will come to fruition because a condition would be Hamas agreeing to disarm, the Journal reported.

Witkoff, meanwhile, met Saturday in Miami with high-level delegations from Egypt, Turkey and Qatar to discuss implementation for the second phase of the Gaza cease-fire plan.


Also:


Project Sunrise: US $112bn Gaza plan turning war into a real estate bonanza

US envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and US President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner have pitched a $112 billion worth of “Project Sunrise” for the development of the war-torn Gaza. The pitch, termed as "sensitive but unclassified,” had 32 pages of PowerPoint slides, with skyscrapers, luxury resorts, high-speed rail, AI-optimised smart grids- a real estate bonanza. The plan doesn't clarify where the 2 million Gazans will live during reconstruction, which nation or companies will fund the project, or what the return on investment will be.

The Project Sunrise

It was developed by Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff with help from Israeli firms and security officials within 45 days. The proposal was shown to officials from Egypt, Turkey and Qatar in Miami on Friday. The project, reportedly, will cost around $112.1 billion and will take 10 years. It plans to develop the Gaza Strip in three phases- removal of destroyed buildings, unexploded ordnance and Hamas’s tunnels- construction of permanent housing, medical facilities, schools and religious spaces- then the luxury beachfront properties, tech corridors and modern transportation hubs will be developed. Geographically, it will start in the South from Rafah, Khan Yunis, then the central camps and finally Gaza City. The United States is supposed to anchor 20 per cent of the fund, and then there will be funding from foreign government grants and sovereign debts.

Why is the Project a trap?

The project classically fits within the framework of a neo-colonial, extractive capitalism. Here, extraction replaces occupation. The projected plan is based on the demilitarisation and decommission of Hamas' weapons and its tunnel network.

“You are not going to convince anyone to invest money in Gaza if they believe another war is going to happen in two, three years,” said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

But the proposal skips some of the fundamental steps. Normally, any conflict resolution will follow these steps chronologically: cease fire, political settlements, re-establishment of governance and then reconstruction. But here it's a ceasefire, then demilitarisation and then reconstruction. Political security and sovereignty to be figured out later. For Hamas, which was formed to end the colonial occupation of Israel and establish a Palestinian state, this will be hard to swallow. Further, there is no plan for the 2 million people to live during the reconstruction of Gaza. The humanitarian aid is conditional on the political surrender, which is a form of coercion. Moreover, the proposal frames this as “Dubai in the Mediterranean”, tries to erase years of trauma and the history and tries to portray it as an underutilised 'real estate'. Palestinians are promised jobs later, not ownership. The rebuilding process starts with holding 2 million people hostage. The core contradiction is how does free economy works on occupied and unfree people and land.

Pax Judaica, Jerusalem And AI Technology

Pax Judaica (Latin for "Jewish Peace") refers to a modern theory, primarily found in online circles and some Islamic eschatological interpretations, envisioning a future global order dominated by Jewish or Israeli power, often linked to end-times prophecy, surveillance, and a "Jewish World Order". It's contrasted with historical terms like "Pax Romana," but in these contexts, it carries fears of technological control (AI, digital gulag) rather than traditional peace.

Key Aspects:

The NWO Theory: Describes a future global system where Israel or Jewish institutions exert total control, often leveraging advanced technology and surveillance.

Eschatological Roots: Draws from interpretations of Biblical and Islamic end-times prophecies (eschatology) about a coming world government or the role of Jerusalem in the final days.

Themes: Involves ideas like a digital surveillance state run from Jerusalem, AI control, and the subjugation of nations, contrasting with traditional power structures.

Cultural References: Appears in novels and media, sometimes as a fictionalized apocalyptic scenario or as a warning against perceived hidden agendas, such as in *Pax Judaica: The Novel* by Ahmad Ibn Fouad.

Origin of the Phrase: "Pax" (peace) and "Judaica" (Jewish things) combine to suggest a "Jewish peace," but the concept is often framed as sinister or controlling, unlike traditional ideas of peace.

In essence, "Pax Judaica" is a contemporary concept about power, technology, and prophecy, often circulating in niche spaces online and in certain religious discussions.

Empires rule through armies, territory, and conquest.

Today, Israel rules through leverage, institutions, surveillance, and proxy control.

The idea of Pax Judaica — not as a slogan, but as a framework for understanding how power now operates in the modern world. Why Israel’s influence appears disproportionate to its size. Why regional actors court Jerusalem before Washington. Why resistance hasn’t disappeared — but no longer has a path to victory.

From historical Pax systems to proxy rule, from geopolitical judo to surveillance and artificial intelligence, this is a breakdown of how dominance is enforced without occupation — and why the next phase of empire won’t announce itself.


Also:


Pax Judaica And The AI Gulag

It is framed as a coming global order in which Jews, or Israel more specifically, preside over a digital gulag – an omniscient AI surveillance architecture, run from Jerusalem, that subordinates nation states, controls access to basic services, and keeps the world’s population on a tight algorithmic leash.

It exploits real developments – Israel’s aggressive deployment of AI and surveillance technology, especially in Gaza and the West Bank; the steady normalisation of digital tracking and control across the planet; the hollowing out of democratic oversight in favour of automated decision-making – and that a secret cabal of Jews is orchestrating world events behind the scenes.

The era of US-led “Pax Americana” is ending. America is being weakened from within – socially, economically, morally. While that empire fractures, a new centre of gravity emerges in Israel. From Jerusalem, so the claim runs, a centralised world authority will govern through an integrated AI surveillance grid. Every communication, financial transaction, movement, and biometric trace is hoovered into this system. Algorithms assign people risk scores, compliance ratings, and social permissions. Access to banking, travel, health care, work – in some versions even access to food – becomes contingent on digital obedience to this hidden authority.

Palestinians are portrayed as experimental subjects: the test case for a planetary control system. The intensification of surveillance and targeting in Gaza and the West Bank is taken as proof of a prototype – the beta version of a digital prison to be rolled out globally once perfected. Where prisons used to have walls and bars, the new detention centre is a mesh of code, devices, and bureaucratic dependencies. All of this, we are told, is “Pax Judaica”.

Firstly, Israel’s integration of advanced technologies into its security and military apparatus is well documented by human rights organisations, investigative journalists, and even by participants in its own tech sector. AI-assisted target selection in Gaza, large-scale data mining, facial recognition systems in Hebron and East Jerusalem, integrated command-and-control platforms, and highly automated drone operations are not science fiction. They are real systems, built by real companies, deployed in real conflicts.

Secondly, Palestinians have been subjected for decades to forms of control, surveillance, and collective punishment that would be intolerable to most populations. Checkpoints, population registries, permit systems, settler violence, confiscation of land, and severe restrictions on movement and trade are not rumours but lived experiences. The addition of machine learning and ubiquitous sensors into this infrastructure does nothing to soften its impact. It hardens it.

Thirdly, the trend towards what might be called “digital enclosure” is not confined to one geography or one people. States and corporations across the world are building systems that harvest behavioural data, assign risk scores, and shape access to resources. Biometric IDs in India, social credit experiments in China, expanded surveillance powers in so-called liberal democracies, the commodification of personal data by global technology firms, and the growing interest of central banks in programmable digital currencies all point to a direction of travel in which the ability to live outside digital networks, or to escape their scrutiny, becomes increasingly fragile.

None of this is speculative. It’s happening in plain sight. There’s no doubt that a digitally mediated control society is possible. Key to any truthful understanding is how far we have already ventured into that territory, and whether we have the political imagination, institutional capabilities, and ethical courage to alter course.

Where an older generation spoke of bankers, newspapers, and revolutionary movements supposedly infiltrated by Jews, the current iteration swaps in AI systems, digital currencies, and global surveillance platforms. The villain remains structurally identical. Only the props have been updated.

Here are several characteristics.

One is the insistence on a single hidden centre of control. The contemporary world is anarchic, fractured, and multipolar. Power is distributed across states, corporations, military alliances, intelligence agencies, religious movements, criminal networks, and transnational capital. These forces compete, collide, and occasionally cooperate, but they don’t converge neatly into a unified command. To reduce this messy system to one nerve centre in Jerusalem is to replace complexity with a comforting goal: that someone is in charge, and we know who they are.

A second is the ethnic and religious coding. By labelling this supposed world order “Judaica”, the narrative implies that there is something inherently Jewish about total surveillance and algorithmic despotism.

A third is the portrayal of Palestinians not simply as victims of occupation and war – but as experimental subjects in a rehearsal for global enslavement.

· Responsibility is narrowed to a single alleged architect, and with that narrowing comes a strange absolution of everyone else. Security agencies in Asia, technology giants headquartered in North America, surveillance vendors in Europe, authoritarian regimes in Africa or Latin America – all of these actors, each building their own instruments of control, recede into the background. The complex circuitry of industrial economism, in which surveillance, data extraction, and militarisation are embedded, are revealed in the Jewish plot.

In that light, the “Pax Judaica” story looks like a glimpse behind the curtain.


Also:


Predictive History Channel Youtube, Transcript

Pax Judaica - The Greater Israel Project and Jerusalem as the Centre of the World

So this is the endgame guys. The Freemasons will create artificial intelligence in Jerusalem and this will become the world government.

Again, this is just conspiracy theory.

Don't believe this. This is just for fun. Okay? But if it happens like this, then that's interesting. Okay? But that's the grand plan to create a world government in Jerusalem.

And what's the center of this world government? Solomon's temple because the Freemasons believe that their founder was the one who created Solomon's temple. So by recreating Solomon's temple, you close the circle.

Okay. So again, this is very complicated. and I don't want to get too many things wrong, but this is a general gist of it. And so what and so what we can see is that all roads lead to Jerusalem. If that is the case, okay, then this helps us understand certain things about the world that otherwise don't make any sense. All right, so let's go over them.

The first thing that doesn't make any sense is America's war on terror. Yes, I understand that America was attacked on 911.

I understand that. But why did they have to go attack Libya and Iraq and all these other places that have nothing to do with al Qaeda? And the answer is they're trying to create something called the Greater Israel Project.

They're trying to have Israel become Pax Judea, the grand power in the Middle East, because that's important in all secret societies. Israel must become the dominant power in the Middle East.

Okay, so this helps us understand why the war on terror happened the way it did. That's number one. Number two is right now America is threatening to attack Iran. Why would they do that? Because in order for Pak Judaica to come into being, Iran must be taken out of the equation. Iran must be destroyed. Then if that were to happen, there would be no challenger to them. Okay, does that make sense, right? The third thing is Silicon Valley and AI.

So right now you have AI chat GPT which doesn't really do anything, okay? It makes cool images on your computer and it helps you cheat on in school. Okay, that's about it. Doesn't really do anything else. And if you don't go to school, then you're like, why am I using chatbot? Okay, and you're not going to pay a lot of money for it. So AI, it's a dead end. But at the same time, around the world, everyone's spending billions, $200 on data centers, right? So, everyone's putting money into AI, but then you're like, well, how can you make money off that?

If you think the answer is for you to use AI, well, it's hard to make money off that. But if the answer is to create an AI surveillance state, that makes a lot more sense, right?

A surveillance state, very easy, guys. We have it in China. Okay, it's digital ID and digital currency.

And the idea is that everything you buy, everything you do will be tracked. And so they can create a profile on you.

This profile will tell the government who you are, how you behave, what you think. Not only that, the government can also manipulate how you think, how you behave. Okay? And this is of course called the mark of the beast.

Right?

And so that's what Pax is a global AI surveillance system. Okay? It also helps us explain immigration in Europe.

Okay? Because the war on terror, you've sent these millions of refugees from Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq into Europe, which is causing a lot of conflict in Europe. Why? Why would that happen? Well, for Pax to come into being, you need to destroy the world. Okay?

So, I'm not saying this is true, but I'm saying like if the goal is Pax Judaica, it does help us connect the dots. It helps to explain why things are happening the way they are. Okay.

Also, the last thing is anti-semitism. Okay. So, you may have noticed if you're online, people don't like the Jews. And this is like out of nowhere after October 7th. Um, you have anti-semitism over the internet. I have criticized Israel before. Okay? But anti-semitism is not the same as anti-zionism, right? Zionism is a belief that Israel is a chosen people and the promised land and all that. Okay? But Judaism as religion, it's perfectly fine. So why would people not care about the difference between anti-zionism, and anti-semitism? Okay.

And you can argue it's all purposeful because remember the part of the plan is to force the Jews to return to Israel. That's very important for this plan to work out. Okay? It's key. That's why you are seeing so much anti-semitism around the world today.

Okay? And the last thing of course and something we'll discuss is something called the red heifer. So red heifers are red cows that are perfectly genetically modified and you need the red heifer in order to sacrifice. The red heifer first is used to purify the ground in order to reconstruct the Solomon's temple. Okay? And guess what? They've already sacrificed the red heifer first. So it seems as though everything is in place. All right?

They're moving towards Pax Judaica.

All right?

So let's discuss what will happen in the short term and in the long term if Pax really is the end goal. Okay. So when you have Israel fighting wars everywhere. Okay. The main enemy right now is Iran.

In Europe, you have the Europeans about to go to war with Russia. In Ukraine, America right now is threatening to attack Venezuela, South America.

You have 10% of the US Navy in the Caribbean and they're about to attack Venezuela.

You have China and Japan at conflict. You have India here and you have Africa. Okay. So, so what's going to happen in the short term? Okay. Well, what we know is that Europe is planning to go to war with Russia.

At the same time, you have a lot of immigrants in Europe and this is going to create civil wars in Europe. So you have both war with Russia as well as civil war. So Europe is kind of screwed. Okay.

America has the same situation where the left right divide is so polarized that eventually they'll go to war. If you read the news, you may have heard about the shootings at Brown University as well as this MIT physicists who were shot. So, random violence will be more and more common in the United States. And you can argue that's all deliberate because the idea is this.

Let's just say you have a jar. You put red ants in a jar and black ants in the jar. They get along fine. But you take the jar and you just shake it up and now they're at war with each other. Okay, that's what's happening where the left and right, they really don't like each other. They don't talk to each other and they refuse to engage in debate with each other, but then going to fight each other, in which case their mentality takes over and they start killing each other. So, we're going to expect civil war in the United States.

Then you're going to have the Americans start to attack Venezuela and possibly other countries in South America. So, America is in for a bad time.

Japan and China and India, they're all going to have conflicts with each other. But also, what we should expect is that America starts to embargo China, meaning America uses its sea power to block China from accessing resources, more seas. And China imports most of its oil and a lot of its food. So if there's a blockade of China, you can expect the Chinese economy to really suffer. All right. But and then what we can expect to happen is America at some point will go to war with Iran and this will destroy both countries. Iran will not lose this war, but it won't win this war neither because America is just going to bomb the crap out of Iran. It's going to send Iran back decades. But America will lose this war. But this is important because America loses war, it's forced out of the Middle East. And once it's forced out of the Middle East, all its military assets goes to Israel, which creates the Pax Judaica. Does that make sense, guys? That's the plan. Okay.

Okay, now you have Pax and what Pax will do is start to control the world because through chaos and conflict, Pax Judaica can make a lot of money, right? Because Pax, what's going to happen is that you have these technology companies like Google, they're going to move over to Pax Judea and build a global surveillance state.

You have civil wars, you need AI to control people. If you're going to war with Russia, you need weapons, okay? But you also need financing as well. So, you can expect a lot of banks to move to Israel and it's possible Israel becomes now the global reserve currency because everyone is trading with Israel.

If you're Russia, you need to your resources, right? Oil, energy, and grain. So, Russia controls a third of the world's carbohydrates. Guess what, guys? Israel controls Africa.

So, what will happen is that Russia and other countries will sign a trade agreement with Israel and Israel becomes a center of global trade.

Okay, does that make sense? So this is how Pax Judaica will profit and remember that Israel has the world's best intelligence agency the Mossad and what they can do is go around the world and create as much chaos as possible. So while the world is burning, Israel is profiting and that's what the future looks like for the next 10 20 years and this will of course lead to the rise of the antichrist who will take control of Pax Judaica and force the world to eventually attack Israel in something called the War of Gog and Magog and this will of course lead to second coming of Jesus. So, that's a grand plan. Right.

Any questions?

Does it make sense to you guys? I know it's evil and you know what? I could be a complete idiot. Okay. I could just make making all this up. But you have to ask yourself three questions. Does it connect the past? Does it explain what's happened in the past? Does it explain what's happening today?

And will these things happen in the future? Okay. So, we haven't lived for the future yet, but you can see the trends.

Okay. All right, guys. The promised land. This is the greater Israel project. Okay. This is what Yahweh promised to Abraham in the Bible. As you as you can see, it's pretty huge which is the entire Middle East extends from the Nile to the Euphrates in Iraq. Okay. It's a huge area and if you say the Israelites are sorry that the Israelis want to achieve the greater Israel project they call you conspiracy theorist like we don't want that. Okay but explain two things to me.

First of all why is the greater Israel map on a chevron of an IDF soldier. Okay these are soldiers Israeli soldiers and they wear the insignia of the greater Israel project. Okay this is the map.

Also, if you look at the flag of Israel, there are two blue lines, right? These represent rivers, the Nile and the Euphrates.

All right? So, if it's a conspiracy theory, then how do you explain these two things? All right. But I want to argue to, you know what, Pax, it's not about Israel or the greater Israel project. What it is ultimately is an alliance of transnational capital multinationals like Google and Meta and intelligence agencies that will be based in Jerusalem. Okay. So, secret societies will be based in Jerusalem and they will use it as a headquarters for their global conspiracy and they will profit from chaos and conflict in around the world because they think that this is the culmination of prophecy.

But it doesn't necessarily mean that Jews will be in charge. Okay? Does that make sense, guys? So, it's a much more complicated idea than people think it is.